Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Artificiqal Intelligence

On 8/22/2024 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Thu Aug 22 14:55:06 2024 Zen Cycle  wrote:

On 8/22/2024 11:00 AM, cyclintom wrote:

On Thu Aug 22 10:18:14 2024 Zen Cycle  wrote:

On 8/21/2024 7:13 PM, cyclintom wrote:

I know you're all expecting me to comment on Liebermann, Flunky or Krygowski, but I am simply going to tell you where it is used.
>
The thumbprint detector on your phone which makes up most consumer goods sold by price. Face recognician software widely used by the government. And voice recognition software used whereever they have enough computationaol power.
>
You all know that your thumbprint is lucky to be recognized one out of 20 times.

>
Mine works 19 out of 20 times the first try, when it doesn't it's
usually an issue of sweaty fingers trying to open the app during a run
or a ride. It's more likely you have it marginally set up, or maybe
you're just using a cheap POS phone with a low-end display resolution.
Tell ya what, mr "i made $14000 off my investments last month" (no, you
didn't)....buy a better phone.
>

Face recognician is so reliable that it is not allowed as evidence in any courtroom in the US.

>
First off, it's Facial Recognition, not face recognician. And no, it
wasn't a typo, you wrote it twice exactly the same way.
>
Facial recognition software is allowed as evidence in _every_ courtroom
in the US, exactly the opposite of what you claim. This is why
California is only now advancing legislation to limit the criminal
justice system use of facial recognition under Assembly Bill 1814.
Critics say it doesn't go far enough because it still allows facial
recognition to be used as evidence.
https://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2024/06/face-recognition-technology-california/
>

As for voice recognition I could not get it to work to properly understand "La Vuelra" once in dozens of tries this morning.

>
Maybe you should have tried it before you were drunk. Voice recognition
works best when you aren't slurring your speech.
>
Of course, knowing you, what you were probably trying to find was "La
Vuelta", but as usual you misspelled it and aren't bright enough to
figure out how to enable the spell checker (Re: "Artificiqal"). And then
it never occurred to you that you were trying to use a spanish phrase on
a system set to understand American English.
>
dumb, dumb, dumb, tommy
>

The point is: even with sharply defined boundaries, AI is a failure. Elon Musk owns an AI company and knows how to propagadize to mmake it successful. There may very well be money to be made investing in it but you cannot have a database large enough to make real AI.

>
I'll give you some credibility on the issue when you can back up your
asinine claims with credible references. Learning how to spell
'artificial' would be a plus.
-- Add xx to reply
>

>
>
>
>
Every day you insist on showing what a complete loser you are.

>
And everyday you insist on showing what a woefully misinformed idiot you
are.
>
>
>
-- Add xx to reply
>

    Again and again, you present your stupidity to the universe. After telling us that it isn't Face Recognician (which is the proper term) you cite an article in which the term face recognician is used. By the wsy twinky, face recognician being used illegally in California is no surprise. We need only remembr the stupid things you've ssid time and agaoin and remember that Calfornia is now a state full of Flunkies whose Governor Gavin Loathsome drove away all of the sane people over the years. You woulde br right at home here but you vouldn't find a job since they don't hire Flunky's.
 As for investment returns - Having a 1 1/4th% return on my investments seems too large to you? While at the same time the market is tracking the huge investments that your queen Janet Yellen has since appologized for. Fat chance that you would EVER appologize for your constant string of lies.
 Face Recognician software is at best extremely unreliable. You show to everyone that you don't have the slightest understanding of AI and then claim that I don't. Did Janet Jellen tell you that?

Must be a conspiracy of worldwide breadth.
Search in DuckDuckGo.com  for "Face Recognician" returns:
No results found for "Face Recognician".
Suggestions:
    Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971