Re: BOLO pervert cyclist

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: BOLO pervert cyclist
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 13. Sep 2024, 15:59:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vc1jvq$thmd$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/13/2024 7:31 AM, John B. wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:37:56 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
 
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:01:20 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 9/12/2024 8:53 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 9/12/2024 7:05 PM, John B. wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:50:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 9/12/2024 7:10 AM, John B. wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 05:23:50 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
On 9/11/2024 5:12 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:35:44 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 9/11/2024 11:38 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
I offered you a risk free way to stop
this and you, apparently, weren't able to give up your habit of
attacking other people in order to try to boost your ego.
>
Oh, bullshit. About your offer of civility, I simply said "We'll
see."
That's based on my prior experience with similar characters in
the past.
>
There was zero risk for you, you could've bailed out at the very
first
time I failed to comply.
>
Maybe if you led by example.
>
I don't believe that you're actually so
stupid not to have understood that.
>
He's smart enough to know a dishonest little prick when he sees one.
>
>
No, you simply couldn't bear to give up your SOP, which is to attack
and berate anyone who doesn't agree with you.
>
Frank disagrees with Andrew on many issues. They don't resort to name
calling and insults at each other. It's because you're a miserable old
prick that you can't handle rational discussion or information that
contradicts your contrived and ignorant statements.
>
>
Well, perhaps because Andrew doesn't declare anyone a coward because
he decides to (legally) carry a firearm.
>
AFAICT, Andrew generally or always rides without a firearm. And I'll bet
he, like the rest of us, would feel no need of a firearm if he were
riding on a quiet bike path where, reportedly, young mothers push their
baby strollers. He can chime in, of course.
>
But does Mr.Muzi never travel with a gun? I see his posts showing guns
in outdoor surroundings. How did he get them there? Mail them?
>
I have carried regularly in some situations but I am no longer regularly
in those situations.
>
Here in Wisconsin my firearms are transported in a locked auto trunk,
cased, unloaded with ammo in a separate case in compliance with the
statute.
>
Which is what I suspected. John the "expert" apparently knows less than
he pretends.
>
You "suspected" that he had "carried regularly in some situations?"
Are you a mind reader besides being a disgusting braggart?"
   Lets see...I wrote: But does Mr.Muzi never travel with a gun? I see
his posts showing guns  in outdoor surroundings. How did he get them
there? Mail them?
Andrew Muzi's actual response was: "Here in Wisconsin my firearms are transported in a locked auto trunk, cased, unloaded with ammo in a separate case in compliance with the statute." Which is what I suspected.
John, you're having more and more difficulty following conversations.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jun 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal