Re: RE: Re: Deep Mud

On 9/13/2024 11:47 AM, cyclintom wrote:

On Fri Sep 13 06:00:58 2024 zen cycle  wrote:

On 9/12/2024 8:27 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:22:57 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>

On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:29:42 -0000 (UTC), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Cull_Canyon_Regional_Recreation_Area#Reservoir_sedimentation_issue>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvZDs5JUr1M>
>

Do you notice that everything I said that was described by you and
flunky to be untrue was described?

>
Nope.  Not everything.  More like less than half of what you wrote. My
problems with what you originally claimed was:
1.  That the deep mud interfered with your bicycle ride.
2.  That you did your best to prevent me from locating the area you were
concerned about.  When I thought I found it, I asked you if it was the
right location, and you want off and started ranting about something
unrelated.
3.  The you never mentione any of the history that was in the video and
on the Wikipedia page.  Both would have explained why whomever or
whatever you blamed were not able to fix things immediately.
4.  You posted a photo of the deep mud sign on your Facebook web page,
but never mentioned it in RBT.
<https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1063064831504932&set=pb.

100034042758783.-2207520000&type=3>

Try searching RBT for that link.  You won't find it.
5.  The barely readable sign looks very different from the new sign in
the video.
6.  You put most of your effort to prevent anyone from verifying your
claims.
7.  I ignored my request that you provide a better photo of the
location.
>
Right now, I don't want to debate this.  Maybe later.  The power went
off 3:15PM to 4:30PM and my phone has been ringing with questions.

>
>
You're missing a lot of screws:
>
1. The claim about deep mud was at the dam and you denied there was ever a
lake there. I said that between rainstorms there was mud running across
the road in upper Cull Canyon and you denied that by using a Google Earth
shot of befoe the rains.
>
2. You don't know that half of the road is covered with trees overhead and
are trying to find an area by looking at the open spots. Why?
>
3. Look, jerkwater, I mentioned a change in the terrain from the heavy
rains and you made it your life's ambition to prove me wrong. Now you find
a reference proving me right and I'm supposed to have supplied you with
that in the first place? More loose screws on your part.
>
4. I posted that picture on Facebook and referred to it multiple times on
RBT because you claimed there was no mud. is there anything you won't lie
about trying to make yourself look sane, let alone correct?
>
5-7. Again you want me to supply better information or allow you to call
me wrong about a place you've never been and simply want to claim I'm a
liar and you don't understand what that makes you look like!
>
Liebermann, you are an idiot and no matter how many times I've given you
an out, you continue to show your stupidity to the world.

>
Tell again how you put out gasoline fires with water, or how a dent
popped out of your top tube by riding the bike?
>

Calling my yacht
club and soliciting personal information and the reaction that got from
the secretary didn't give you the least clue about yourself. And here you
carry on!
>
Do you actually think that you couldn't find an engineering job in the
hottest EE market in the whole world because you're a jew?

>
When did Jeff ever write that? wow, talk about a strawman.....from a
disgusting anti-semite, no less.
>

You couldn't
find employment because there is clearly something wrong in your head and
managers aren't going to put up with it!
>
You and Flunky are two of a kind. He was lucky enough to find a job that
doesn't require him to be an engineer. You couldn't even do that.

>
You were never "lucky" enough to find a job where they didn't see
through your bullshit and fire you within the year. The only 'luck' I
ever experienced with my career path was the reference from a recruiter
for the job I have now. I've reached where I am based on talent,
motivation, education and experience.
>
Regardless of any claims you make, we know you were never really
anything more than an engineering technician. Every technical subject
you've engaged in has been somewhere between misinformed and completely
wrong, from stupid claims about 'light lines', PWM (which you _still_
don't understand), VHDL (yes, still a commonly used programming
language), chemistry (no, Aluminum oxide is _not_ flammable and you
_don't_ put out gas fires with water), and mechanical engineering (no,
you didn't pop a dent out of your top tube by riding the bike). You
claim to be a world-class programmer with experience in programming
artificial intelligence, but completely stumbled over a question of the
A/D resolution on a program you allegedly wrote.
>
These are not the actions of a talented and well-regarded engineer,
they're the actions of a worn-out talentless hack who couldn't hold a job.
>
Even these ridiculous claims you make about being rich are complete lies
- You wrote in this forum ten years ago that you were broke and living
off social security, yet now you claim to be making $12K/month off
investments, yet can't afford to move out of your hell-hole neighborhood
or even take a vacation.
>
The only lying fool in this forum is you. Everyone here knows it.

    Only shit liike that can come from a moron like you. Perhaps you forget my grandparents were Jewish. No, you didn't forget, you were in stupid mode where you sre 95% of the time.

I don't believe your grand parents were Jewish. It's likely just another lie you tell. Even if it's true, I'm sure they would be so proud of your antisemitic rants here.

 Why don't you tell us who you work for so that we can see what they think of your spending all day every day on the newsgroups?

So you can send them harassing emails and phone calls? Sorry. Besides, if you were half as smart and technologically savvy as you claim, you would have figured it out by now, dumbass

 As I said, you found a job where you didn't need to actually be an engineer.

Funny how my job title is Principal Compliance and Sustaining Engineer without actually doing any actual engineering. BTW - I just finished a Theory of Protection document showing compliance of a new product to IEC intrinsic safety requirements, which in part required circuit analysis to generate thermal derating curves for passives and semiconductors in situ (which is the important part). Simple stuff really, but I realize all of that just zipped over your head like a peregrine falcon sweeping down on a jack rabbit nonetheless. Perhaps you might take a little time to research it and realize how completely lacking your design analysis skills really are (as if we all didn't already know), mr. PWM cable tester.

So that makes you 100 times smarter than Liebermann which says less about you than it does of Liebermann.

Jeff is one of the more intellectually competent posters here, I'd be hesitant to put myself on his level. That says way more about you than it does anyone else.
--
Add xx to reply