Re: RE: Re: Garmin altitude problems

On 11/9/2024 10:44 AM, cyclintom wrote:

On Fri Nov 8 16:48:21 2024 Zen Cycle  wrote:

On 11/8/2024 4:41 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 11/8/2024 3:59 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

>
New meds?

>
That's a possibility. _Something_ has certainly happened to Tom in the
last few days!
>

>
I'm thinking it was an endorphin rush from the election results, maybe
he's finally coming down.
>
-- Add xx to reply

    Again posting during business hours. Tell us what business you're really in, Babysitting? Pretending to us that you are an EE?

Tommy tommy tommy...
First off, I'm 3 hours ahead of you. I posted that at 4:48 PM my time.
2nd - I don't have set hours. Engineering staff in the vast majority of high-tech companies aren't told when they need to be there, for how long, or how late they need to stay. I haven't had to worry about that since I was a bench technician punching a time clock in the 1980s. It's not uncommon for me - or anyone of the engineering staff here - to take off in the afternoon or come in later in the morning becasue they had an errand to run.
This is how I know you were never more than a bench technician. If you had any _real_ engineering experience, you'd know the term "working hours" for engineering staff is nebulous at best. Hell, your "career" is in the backyard of companies that pioneered the "work-life balance" ethos, and you claim engineering staff are locked into rigid office hours?
3rd, I spent most of friday writing a rationale to defend suggested changes to an ANSI Hazardous Location Standard, for a technical working group I'm a member of. I finished it a little early. I could have stayed home to do or maybe finished it up this weekend if I wanted to. It's a luxury/perk I have as the most senior individual in my department and the title of "principle engineer".
--
Add xx to reply