Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On 11/14/2024 10:59 AM, AMuzi wrote:Fair enough. Which applies much more broadly than merely segregated bicycle paths!!On 11/14/2024 9:48 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:True. As with many issues, people can excuse the broad data by claiming it applies only (or more?) to subgroups. But as with many issues, we can never get 100% granular data. We have to make do with the data we have.>>
I'm explaining why bike paths have been found to cause more crashes per kilometer than ordinary roads.
>
Apparently, for certain people to understand why, it's necessary to repeat the information.
>
Not that I mind. Any competent teacher knows that people seldom really grasp a new fact the first time they hear it.
People choose what they like, for their own reasons or for no reason.
>
As mentioned recently here, separated paths skew to a different demographic than urban commuting in traffic, different than large Sunday morning touring clubs, different than Cat 5 criteriums, etc. All of those contribute to the overall non-path rate per mile yet each subgroup's rate is different.
If nothing else, the links I've given should indicate that on linear park bike trails, people should be a bit more alert than they typically are.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.