Re: RE: Re: Todays rant

On 12/2/2024 11:12 AM, cyclintom wrote:

On Sun Dec 1 20:21:32 2024 zen cycle  wrote:

On 12/1/2024 5:11 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 16:55:50 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 11/30/2024 4:13 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 11/30/2024 2:00 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 13:11:09 -0500, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>

>
https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/current-inflation-
rates/

>
Yup, a hangover from the trump administration. It took Biden another two
years to fix it.
>

>

>
Biden was inaugurated on 1/20/21. Inflation was 1.4%. It began going
up as soon as Biden sat down in the oval office and signed 17
executive orders. It was 4% by April, 7% by the end of the year. It
kept going up and didn't hit 9% until Biden had been President for 17
months. Biden owns the inflation.
>
>
-- C'est bon
Soloman

>
There is an argument that both administrations spent irresponsibly* but
the immediate actions to suppress fuel production and transport had an
immediate and drastic effect.

>
All the reputable articles I've read say that yes, Biden's stimulus
efforts did add some to inflation; and BTW, so did Trump's stimulus
checks; but that those causes had far less effect than the COVID
pandemic and the invasion of Ukraine.
>
But I expect that nobody who voted for the Republican ticket will ever
agree. As with so many other issues, many people love simplistic
answers, especially if they can blame politicians they don't like.

>
Biden's inflationary policies are only one reason the voters rejected
Democrats. The Democrats ridiculous actions in response to Covid was
another... and those actions also added to inflation.

>
oh, you mean these democratic actions?
>
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-29/trump-s-operation-warp-speed-aims-to-rush-coronavirus-vaccine
>
you are such a fucking tool.
  >
>
--

C'est bon
Soloman

>

    Flunky thinks that giving emergency authorization to develop a vaccine made Pfizer and Moderna develop and entirely experimental mRNA drug that killed 10% of the people that were given it almost immediately (withing 14 days) when it wasn't even classed as vaccine related.

More of tommys vivid imagination....
1) the link was a demonstration of the magatards willingness to blame others for the actions of their administration.
B) Tommy's imagination that the vaccine killed 10% of all recipients within 14 days is pure fantasy, having no basis whatsoever in any realm of reality within this physical universe.

 Fliunky has to show everyone just how mentally ill he is as a demonstration.

Not nearly as mentally ill as someone contrives "killed 10% of the people that were given it almost immediately (withing 14 days)"
--
Add xx to reply