Sujet : Re: Todays rant
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 06. Dec 2024, 20:39:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vivjsv$2h5ku$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/6/2024 4:18 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 20:29:23 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 12/5/2024 6:07 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>
I remember someone who insists that the fact that people who have guns
sometimes get shot mean that having a gun makes you more likely to get
shot.
You're not remembering. You're imagining straw man positions. Just like
Tom, you imagine arguments in which you're "winning."
>
I've given multiple citations of reputable sources, and many links to
reputable studies. You've given only snarks, which is one of the reasons
I so seldom respond to you.
>
You've got the intellectual depth of a whiny third grader.
My, I seem to have upset Mr. Tricycle! How could that have happened? ;-)
I remember it well. You went on and on insisting that the correlation
between gun shot victims and gun owning victims meant owning a gun was
dangerous.
Post links to exactly what I said, and we can discuss. People here don't trust your "memory" any more than we trust the "memory" of Tom Kunich.
As for your citations of reputable sources, the thing is; you saying
they're reputable doesn't make them reputable.
Yeah, I know. Any source that disagrees with your simplistic mind is not reputable. Perhaps I should be quoting the Epoch Times instead? Or maybe Tucker Carlson? ;-)
Have you yet grown the courage to ride your tricycle on a bike path without having a handgun for feelings of security?
I thought not.
-- - Frank Krygowski