Re: Artificiqal Intelligence

On 1/15/2025 2:37 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:09:18 -0800, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
 

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:49:44 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

On Sat Aug 24 19:26:32 2024 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:

On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 23:13:29 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>

You all know that your thumbprint is lucky to be recognized one out
of 20 times.

>
Try running the hardware diagnostics on your Samsung phone:
<https://eu.community.samsung.com/t5/other-galaxy-s-series/did-you-

know-you-can-check-your-phones-hardware-yourself/td-p/2797584>

"If you have the Samsung Members App installed, at the bottom of your
screen click on 'GET HELP' and then go 'Phone Care' and "Interactive
Checks' and you can test 12 different hardware components of your
phone."
>
Samsung Members App:
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?

id=com.samsung.android.voc&hl=en_US>

>
However, if your hand or index finger is shaking from Parkinson's,
Multiple Sclerosis, Hyperthyroidism, excessive caffeine, alcohol
withdrawal, low blood sugar, smoking, etc the fingerprint test might
fail to function properly.
>
I'll try the app on a Samsung S10e and see if and how the fingerprint
test works (after the battery is done charging and the phone is done
updating).

>

Don't you understand the difference between minimal voice recognotion
and real artificial intelliugence?

>
I never mentioned AI.  Your Samsung Galaxy A51 cell phone does not use
AI to recognize your fingerprint or your voice.  Reading Samsung's
instructions for running the hardware diagnostics baked into your phone
is well beyond your abilities.  Are you afraid of failing the
fingerprint reader self test?  The best you can do is dish out more
insults and change the subject to something else, such as AI or
yourself.  Like I've mentioned too often, you're a waste of my time.
>

You have spent your entire life working as an electronics technician.
Why is that if you're so smart? You seem incapable of reflecting on your
own life.

>
Whatever.

    perhaps you cqan explain to people here HOW you can have facial OR
fingerprint recognician without AI? Do you HAVE to keep showing why you
are a failure?

The first hundred years or so of fingerprint matching was on paper by humans.
Computerized imaging and digitized analysis made it faster and probably better.
Introducing large language models may well improve that, at some risk of the system 'inventing' matches where none exist but all that is as yet unknown.
https://www.techtarget.com/WhatIs/definition/AI-hallucination
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971