Re: bike light optics

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: bike light optics
De : funkmaster (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zen Cycle)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 01. Apr 2024, 14:31:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uue9e8$2fqcf$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/31/2024 10:33 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/31/2024 6:56 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 3/31/2024 5:11 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
On 3/31/2024 4:42 AM, zen cycle wrote:
>
For that matter, I don't see how it's likely that a tree branch could be
so low in the road as to take you off the bike but not cause damage to
every passing SUV.
>
If you ride in the middle of the traffic lane, you're correct. If you
"stay to the right," whether on the shoulder or in a painted or
protected bike lane, the SUV is not going to be there (at least they're
not supposed to be there).
>
"Taking the lane" sounds good in theory, but realistically, most
cyclists stay to the right.
>
>
Do you not have buses? Most residential streets in London and even some of
the bigger cities will have large bus networks which use residential
streets as well that’s where the people are, And with London are double
deckers in most cases. Are places where the bus has to driver further out
but they are uncommon enough to require signs warning buses!
>
Roger Merriman
>
>
>
I can't speak to Santa Clara or London specifically, but most places the bus routes are on arterials while savvy cyclists are a block over on a less busy parallel street
 True, but tall vehicles like Amazon delivery vans, Ford Transits and similar vans, pickups towing trailers, garbage trucks etc. are on all streets at least occasionally. If there were such low branches over the roadway those vehicles would get damaged and/or the owners would complain to the city.
 On roads, the problem is imaginary. On every bike trail I've seen, the problem has been imaginary, other than one incident when a storm tipped over a tree.
It's not uncommon in this area for low branches to encroach on multi-use/recreational trails.

 And even then, I saw that hazard in plenty of time with my Busch & Mueller headlight with a properly cut off beam. Those who imagine zero light above the cutoff are also imagining things.
 Unlike Tom Kunich, Mr. Scharf knows how to post links to photos. If the problem were real and common, he'd have given evidence by now.
 
--
Add xx to reply

Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Mar 24 * bike light optics151Frank Krygowski
30 Mar 24 +* Re: bike light optics149sms
30 Mar 24 i+- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
30 Mar 24 i+* Re: bike light optics6sms
30 Mar 24 ii+* Re: bike light optics2AMuzi
30 Mar 24 iii`- Re: bike light optics1Jeff Liebermann
31 Mar 24 ii+* Re: bike light optics2Frank Krygowski
31 Mar 24 iii`- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
31 Mar 24 ii`- Re: bike light optics1sms
31 Mar 24 i`* Re: bike light optics141zen cycle
31 Mar 24 i `* Re: bike light optics140sms
1 Apr 24 i  +* Re: bike light optics137AMuzi
1 Apr 24 i  i+* Re: bike light optics134Frank Krygowski
1 Apr 24 i  ii`* Re: bike light optics133Zen Cycle
3 Apr 24 i  ii `* Re: bike light optics132sms
3 Apr 24 i  ii  `* Re: bike light optics131Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 24 i  ii   `* Re: bike light optics130Zen Cycle
3 Apr 24 i  ii    +- Re: bike light optics1AMuzi
4 Apr 24 i  ii    +* Re: bike light optics5Catrike Ryder
4 Apr 24 i  ii    i+- Re: bike light optics1AMuzi
4 Apr 24 i  ii    i`* Re: bike light optics3sms
4 Apr 24 i  ii    i +- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
4 Apr 24 i  ii    i `- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
4 Apr 24 i  ii    `* Re: bike light optics123Frank Krygowski
4 Apr 24 i  ii     +* Re: bike light optics7AMuzi
4 Apr 24 i  ii     i`* Re: bike light optics6Frank Krygowski
4 Apr 24 i  ii     i `* Re: bike light optics5AMuzi
4 Apr 24 i  ii     i  `* Re: bike light optics4Zen Cycle
5 Apr 24 i  ii     i   `* Re: bike light optics3AMuzi
5 Apr 24 i  ii     i    +- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
5 Apr 24 i  ii     i    `- Re: bike light optics1Zen Cycle
4 Apr 24 i  ii     +- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
4 Apr 24 i  ii     `* Re: bike light optics114Frank Krygowski
5 Apr 24 i  ii      +* Re: bike light optics62Frank Krygowski
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i`* Re: bike light optics61Frank Krygowski
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i +- Re: bike light optics1Radey Shouman
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i `* Re: bike light optics59AMuzi
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i  +* Re: bike light optics57Jeff Liebermann
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i`* Re: bike light optics56AMuzi
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i +* Re: bike light optics5Zen Cycle
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i i`* Re: bike light optics4AMuzi
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i i +* Re: bike light optics2Zen Cycle
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i i i`- Re: bike light optics1AMuzi
6 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i i `- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
6 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i `* Re: bike light optics50Jeff Liebermann
6 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  +- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
6 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  +* Re: bike light optics47AMuzi
6 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i`* Re: bike light optics46Frank Krygowski
6 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i `* Re: bike light optics45AMuzi
6 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i  +* Re: bike light optics8Frank Krygowski
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i  i+* Re: bike light optics3Catrike Ryder
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i  ii`* Re: bike light optics2Frank Krygowski
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i  ii `- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i  i`* Re: bike light optics4AMuzi
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i  i `* Re: bike light optics3Frank Krygowski
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i  i  `* Re: bike light optics2AMuzi
8 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i  i   `- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i  `* Re: bike light optics36zen cycle
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   +* Re: bike light optics28Catrike Ryder
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i`* Re: bike light optics27AMuzi
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i `* Re: bike light optics26zen cycle
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  +* Re: bike light optics24AMuzi
8 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i+- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
8 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i`* Re: bike light optics22Zen Cycle
8 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i `* Re: bike light optics21AMuzi
9 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i  +- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
9 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i  +- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
9 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i  +* Re: bike light optics4Catrike Ryder
9 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i  i`* Re: bike light optics3Radey Shouman
10 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i  i +- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
10 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i  i `- Re: bike light optics1Zen Cycle
9 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i  `* Re: bike light optics14Zen Cycle
9 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i   +- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
9 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i   `* Re: bike light optics12AMuzi
10 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i    `* Re: bike light optics11Zen Cycle
10 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i     `* Re: bike light optics10AMuzi
11 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i      +* Re: bike light optics5John B.
11 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i      i`* Re: bike light optics4AMuzi
11 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i      i +- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
12 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i      i `* Re: bike light optics2John B.
12 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i      i  `- Re: bike light optics1AMuzi
11 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i      `* Re: bike light optics4Zen Cycle
11 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i       +- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
11 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i       `* Re: bike light optics2AMuzi
11 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  i        `- Re: bike light optics1AMuzi
8 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   i  `- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i   `* Re: bike light optics7AMuzi
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i    +* Re: bike light optics4Frank Krygowski
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i    i+* Re: bike light optics2AMuzi
8 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i    ii`- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i    i`- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
7 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i    `* Re: bike light optics2zen cycle
8 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  i     `- Re: bike light optics1sms
6 Apr 24 i  ii      i  i  `- Re: bike light optics1Frank Krygowski
5 Apr 24 i  ii      i  `- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
5 Apr 24 i  ii      `* Re: bike light optics51sms
6 Apr 24 i  ii       +* Re: bike light optics29Frank Krygowski
8 Apr 24 i  ii       i`* Re: bike light optics28Radey Shouman
9 Apr 24 i  ii       i `* Re: bike light optics27Frank Krygowski
9 Apr 24 i  ii       i  `* Re: bike light optics26Radey Shouman
9 Apr 24 i  ii       i   +- Re: bike light optics1AMuzi
10 Apr 24 i  ii       i   `* Re: bike light optics24Frank Krygowski
9 Apr 24 i  ii       `* Re: bike light optics21Jeff Liebermann
1 Apr 24 i  i+- Re: bike light optics1Catrike Ryder
1 Apr 24 i  i`- Re: bike light optics1Zen Cycle
1 Apr 24 i  +- Re: bike light optics1Zen Cycle
1 Apr 24 i  `- Re: bike light optics1sms
30 Mar 24 `- Re: bike light optics1pH

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal