Re: bike light optics

On 4/6/2024 8:27 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 4/5/2024 10:54 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

 Well, if taxation is not your cup of tea (or blood), then perhaps we
should finance our government using the traditional methods of
sacking, plundering and pillaging other countries.  This has worked
fairly well since history has been recorded (by the winners).  If you
want some fairness and logic, successful conquerors usually hire
politicians, philosophers and economists to justify their actions, all
of which are summarily declared to be fair and logical.
>

 The original Constitution had a better ethos IMHO than the incorporation of envy as a guiding principle after the XVI Amendment. Predictably the situation has degraded such that more than half of us pay zip and many of those have a negative Federal tax burden, i.e., they are paid to be here. So much for 'shared burden'. And also predictably election results reflect the avarice and envy of the takers against the makers, creating societal and cultural divisions to our greater loss.  There has to be a better way. And there was.

As usual, I'm interested in how other nations manage things. Which leads me to again ask: Is there a nation that finances its operation in ways you like?
I'm aware that much of Europe has economic structures that generate far less economic disparity. Taxes are higher, but tax-generated benefits are also far higher, and citizens are generally much more content. It's not that there are zero problems, but that there seem to be far fewer problems than we have.
Also, when making comparisons, it seems simplistic to say "The U.S. did things better in 1795" or whenever. Conditions were totally different then regarding society, technology, morality, customs, personal freedom etc. Anyone who campaigned for election saying "Let's just go back to all the laws we had in 1795" would surely lose the vote of almost all women and blacks, and most of while males as well.
--
- Frank Krygowski