Sujet : Re: Excuses, excuses
De : am (at) *nospam* yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 11. Apr 2024, 14:30:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Message-ID : <uv8l52$1m840$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/10/2024 9:42 PM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:39:14 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 4/10/2024 1:54 AM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:18:54 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 21:51:02 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
Last I checked, there were
still over ten million miles bicycled between fatalities, and cycling
was much safer per mile than walking.
>
>
<LOL> Safer per mile is a ridiculously stupid statistic. I'll wager
that cycling is much safer *per mile* than mountain climbing, too.
>
But it justifies his arguments so perfectly.
>
But evening things up perhaps hour of use would be more accurate.
After all a cyclist roaring down the road at 15 MPH can hardly be
compared with an auto traveling, sat, 70-80 MPH or an old lady
waddling along at 4 MPH.
>
Just as aircraft accidents are measured at hour of use not MPH
>
Welcome back, Mr Slocumb.
Thank you. Been enjoying the pleasures of foreign lands.
We haven't yet received your postcards.
-- Andrew Muziam@yellowjersey.orgOpen every day since 1 April, 1971