Re: Cycling editorial

On 5/2/2024 9:41 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Thu, 2 May 2024 07:43:39 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
 

On 5/1/2024 4:24 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Mon Apr 22 07:42:11 2024 AMuzi  wrote:

On 4/21/2024 9:12 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 4/21/2024 4:19 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Fri Apr 19 19:20:03 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 4/19/2024 12:46 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

>
Why are you talking about bicycles? Shouldn't you be
telling us how all of the recent medical studies showing
large increases in cancer from the mRNA vaccines...

>
Well, it IS supposed to be a bicycle discussion group.
I'm sure there
are mRNA discussion groups. Won't they let you post there?

>
Frank, bicycling is an excercise and mRNA vaccines can
KILL you if you accept those vaccines.

>
Right, on Friday's club ride, they called for a county
snowplow to scrape rider corpses off the road so they could
ride. If only those people had listened to Tom Kunich
instead of their physicians with those silly medical degrees!
>
Won't they let you post on the forums where actual
physicians post? Is that why you spew medical nonsense here?
>

>
I'm not sure this is the best forum to discuss a complex
phenomenon but there's a grain of truth in it:
>
https://www.livescience.com/health/coronavirus/rare-clotting-effect-of-early-covid-shots-finally-explained-what-could-that-mean-for-future-vaccines
>
albeit overstated.

>

>
>
I sort of agree with you that this isn't a good place to discuss covid-19 but where is. Blood clotting was not a rare side effect. And those vaccines were administerred to Billionsillions of people causing the unmistakable deaths of millions.
>
It immediately became apparent that one out of every 800 people were dying from effects of the vaccines! Normally an acceptable number is one out of 100,000. And in child vacciunes less than one out of 10 million.
>
Almost all of the present excess deaths are to people under 40.And as I pointed out long ago, it is causing an AIDS-like syndrome that is pretty much unstoppable because RgG4 antibodies are telling your immune system not to repair the dammage from the vaccine.
>
Now remember that most countries are signers of the Geneva Convention Treaty. This forbids GMOs except under special licensed cases. That is why Fauci took it to China. They are not a member of the Geneva onvention.
>
The "vaccines" are nothing of the sort but are themselves GMO's (Genetically Modified Organisms)
>
Do you know what China did to protect themselves? They simply inujected the spike protein which gave them protection via the immune sydtem against the SARS-Cov-2 virus.
>
Why did the vaccine companies illegally use an unnecessary GMO? Money.And the pretense that mRNA might become useful.Transcroiption of DNA to RNA is a known chemistry and the same enzumes work both ways. So putting mRNA into your body guarantees that you are changing the human genome. This causes any multiple number of illnesses from death of one friend from blood clots after 26 days to another friend's failure of a nerve pathway to his left leg, to sudden and severe cancer now known as Turbo Cancer in any number of locations. People are DYING from skin cancver which was unheard of because it was simply cut off of the affected area.
>
SARS Cov-2 IS NOT a dangerous virus I've had it twice, it is a respiratory virus and I have damaged lungs and it was no big deal. The vaccines ARE a huge deal espedcially if you took more than two shots.

>
There's a lot of that sort of thing in the popular press but
I happened to read a piece last evening by Dr Joseph Wang
(10 years microbiologist in vaccine development) which
referenced the recent Japan study.  Japan has the world's
highest Pfizer mRNA shot incidence and has extensive whole
population (123 million) medical data for almost all Japanese.
>
Here's the actual paper, no paywall:
>
https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/

 At the bottom of the above article, there are 6 comments, 5 of which
are from physicians or MD's.  All 6 complain that the findings were
not statistically significant.  The article also emphasizes the
increase in AGE ADJUSTED mortality rate.  This is for the US but works
well for most other countries:
<https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/age>
Notice that the overall incidence cancer rates increase dramatically
with age.
 If anything, the increased incidence rates in the study point out the
effects of age and the improved early cancer detection rates, as
indicated by the overall downward incidence trends.  Note that even
with the inclusion of alleged vaccine induced cancers, the overall
rate still continues to decrease.  See Fig 4.
 

I made no claims but merely noted that, despite many opinions, actual data exists and I linked to that.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971