Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Tue May 28 15:41:26 2024 AMuzi wrote:On 5/28/2024 3:31 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
-snip all to hell-
>>>
All you had to do is read that entire string to discover that Jay was WAY out in left field. But that was too difficult for you to do because that would require you actually knowing the meaning of words.
>
>
Not to mention the Constitutional rights of all citizens. I don't have to protect YOUR Granny by wearing a mask that doesn't work and the government CANNOT sieze the property of someone because someone else stole their car and was moving drugs with it. A DA CAN prosecute it as a knowing collusion but the chances of proving it is nil.
>
Over and over your stupity is so extrme that it is irritating. ALL it takes to see your own failures is to look at your net worth and that is so bad that you are left denying that it is a reasonable measure of competence.
Regarding
>
"the government CANNOT sieze* the property of someone
because someone else stole their car and was moving drugs
with it"
>
you might review the civil forfeiture statutes and their
draconian applications over the years. They most certainly
can, often have and will.
>
*seize
>
Andrew, you are certainly correct about how the laws have been ENFORCED and often prosecuted. But these cases have been almost all overturned on appeal. Funny thing about superior courts not driven for political gain.I fail to see the nexus between civil forfeiture and Presidential assassination attempts. Which is OK I don't need to know that.
Harry Truman was a farmer. He had been the VP of Roosevelt and when Roosevelt died Truman became President for a partial term and then was elected to his own Presidency. Two gunmen showed up and made an attempt to break into the oval office. The DC police stopped one of them and the other got into the Oval Office and the Secret Service very nearly wasn't fast enough to keep President Truman from taking the gun away from the gunman and beating him half to death with it.
Just think of what he would do to that judge in the Trump hush money case. When the judicial system becomes politicized all truth disappears from it.
There was a gangland drug case in New York City. ONE honest cop arrested a black Mafioso drug lord and then became a prosecuting attorney and then exchanged information for time in the pokey. It turned out that over HALF of the New York City Police on the drug enforcement decision were on the take.
What are the chances that everyone in this administration are on the take? I just heard that a woman in one of the agencies flat up and quit and she was known for honesty.
That doesn't leave a good chance at justice for you and I.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.