Re: Riding after heavy manual labor

On 5/31/2024 10:40 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Fri May 31 05:12:24 2024 zen cycle  wrote:

On 5/29/2024 5:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:

>
Such as Harry Truman bashing an assassin with a pistol maybe?

>
Funny how tommy "read out" three libraries, yet never came across an
account of the assassination attempt on Truman.

>
>
>
>
Of what use was a knowledge of politics for one headed for a career in science?

First off, it's history, not politics, dumbass.
Second, It isn't necessary, but if you actually read out three libraries, you would have come across an account of the Truman assassination attempt. If you purposefully skipped the sections on the library with history, politics, philosophy, or any other subject not dedicated to the sciences, then you didn't actually read out any libraries.
(no, tommy, no one believes you did any extensive reading in any libraries, let alone 'read them out').

You tell us that you have a degree in electronics engineering and yet are incapable of programming.

No matter how many times you tell that lie, it will never become true. I've done plenty of programming, I just find it to be slightly less boring than watching paint dry and I'm admittedly not very good at it. For that matter, you couldn't answer a simple question about the a/d scaling in a program you allegedly wrote, and weren't even aware of the commented section that described the a/d hardware until I pointed it out. Just where did you steal that code from tommy? You very clearly didn't write it.

One therefore infers that you NEVER took a class in digital electronics which would demand a knowledge of programming.

Only you would infer that, because you operate on a false first premise (like you do with oh so many things)
So, stupid, first off a class in digital electronics doesn't demand a knowledge of programming. Fundamental digital classes focus on discrete gates, boolean (combinatorial) logic, and functional completeness. No programming or understanding of programming languages is required.
https://pages.uoregon.edu/rayfrey/DigitalNotes.pdf
Programming for hardware equivalents isn't brought into the picture until those fundamentals are understood, and yes, this is where VHDL is introduced - to program combinatorial equivalents.
I've worked with plenty of programmers who have so little understanding of hardware that they rely on an engineering tech to help them troubleshoot their test beds.

>
I wish that just ONE of you three would be capable of telling the truth, but you have shown that is a wish never to be fulfilled.
>

oh, the irony...."I was a senior business consultant"....lol