Re: Riding after heavy manual labor

On 6/1/2024 8:17 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 6/1/2024 3:03 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Fri, 31 May 2024 20:36:19 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

>
>
So far, the takeaway is that no cities are acceptable to you. I'd say
it's time to adopt more realistic standards.
>
-- - Frank Krygowski

>
There's another name for lowering your standards. It's called "copping
out."

 +1

Again, no cities are run acceptably according to you. And so you choose not to live in a city - a fairly recent decision, assuming (or guessing) that you lived somewhere near your shop's previous location.
I'm not sure if moving out equates to copping out; but you seem to think it solved a problem for you. You shouldn't disparage it.
And you're still in the position of grumping about (apparently) every city on earth. If you say _no_ city is good, ISTM that demonstrates you're demanding an unreasonable level of perfection.

The standards to which we hold other organizations and individuals go right out the window for government and education administrations. How does that make any sense?

I think you need to be more specific. Are there really organizations that meet your high standards? Organizations where time and money are never wasted, where all judgments are correct, where mistakes are almost never made and are admitted and corrected immediately?
What organizations would those be?
--
- Frank Krygowski