Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 10. Jun 2024, 04:54:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v45pt7$3pm3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/9/2024 5:59 PM, AMuzi wrote:
 The above was: Repair damaged areas first, then two passes of two inch asphalt, freshly graded shoulders with fresh gravel cover, center lane stripes and border* line.
I may have mentioned this before, but: A few years ago I stopped at the County Engineer's booth at our huge county fair. I wanted to learn how, over the years, the little rural roads went from gravel to "paved" - and I put that in quotes because they are often in bad shape, for at least a couple reasons. I was particularly curious about the base or foundation of the pavement, which I understand to be very important.
The two young engineers looked at each other with raised eyebrows and told the tale. Decades ago whoever was County Engineer decided to make his name (and win reelection) by paving the maximum possible number of gravel roads. He had it done by doing essentially no preparation. They were scraped level and covered with asphalt. Supposedly, layer after layer has been paved on top ever since.
Admittedly, I'm not a Civil Engineer. But I wonder what base preparation your local company did before laying down the asphalt. I do know that state or municipal pavement is supposed to be done to high standards. Civil Engineering students I knew got summer internships in which they took core samples and tested them to be sure the paving contractors were doing things according to contract specs.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Jun 24 * Antipersonnel infrastructure28AMuzi
9 Jun 24 +* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure2Frank Krygowski
9 Jun 24 i`- Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure1AMuzi
9 Jun 24 `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure25Catrike Ryder
9 Jun 24  +* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure2Catrike Ryder
9 Jun 24  i`- Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure1AMuzi
9 Jun 24  +* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure17AMuzi
9 Jun 24  i`* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure16Frank Krygowski
9 Jun 24  i `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure15AMuzi
9 Jun 24  i  `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure14Jeff Liebermann
9 Jun 24  i   `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure13AMuzi
10 Jun 24  i    +- Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure1Frank Krygowski
11 Jun 24  i    `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure11Jeff Liebermann
11 Jun 24  i     +- Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure1Jeff Liebermann
12 Jun 24  i     `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure9AMuzi
13 Jun 24  i      `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure8Radey Shouman
13 Jun 24  i       +* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure4zen cycle
13 Jun 24  i       i+- Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure1AMuzi
15 Jun 24  i       i`* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure2Radey Shouman
15 Jun 24  i       i `- Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure1Jeff Liebermann
13 Jun 24  i       `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure3Catrike Ryder
13 Jun 24  i        `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure2AMuzi
13 Jun 24  i         `- Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure1Catrike Ryder
9 Jun 24  `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure5AMuzi
9 Jun 24   `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure4AMuzi
9 Jun 24    `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure3AMuzi
10 Jun 24     `* Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure2Frank Krygowski
10 Jun 24      `- Re: Antipersonnel infrastructure1AMuzi

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal