Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Petential Energy doing Work

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Petential Energy doing Work
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 15. Jul 2024, 20:19:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v73p72$q74d$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/15/2024 12:35 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Mon Jul 1 14:15:52 2024 Frank Krygowski  wrote:
On 7/1/2024 11:50 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
>
You clearly stated that if you stand in a parking lot and tip your bike over that it would shoot out from under you ...
>
Nope, I said essentially the opposite. I suggested you try standing tall
during a track stand, for maximum potential energy, then dropping to the
saddle. I noted that the reduction in PE does _not_ generate an increase
in Kinetic Energy in that case. There's no mechanism for it to do so.
>
Sorry you found that confusing; but I'm not surprised.
>
 Krygowski, you want ME to cite your exact words bereft of what you were actually addressing so I am sure that my exact words were at least as accurate as yours since I was addressing the facts.
 Lowering the center of gravity in a gravity field of a moving body ADDS energy to the mass. Either tell us where is goes or STOP trying to imply it doesn't.
Lowering the center of mass does not necessarily add kinetic energy to the mass. Again, as I said:
"I suggested you try standing tall
during a track stand, for maximum potential energy, then dropping to the
saddle. I noted that the reduction in PE does _not_ generate an increase
in Kinetic Energy in that case. There's no mechanism for it to do so."
You've provided no evidence that tilting over in a curve makes a bike+rider faster, which was the original point under discussion. Your loud and frantic assertions are proving nothing.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Jun 24 * Re: Petential Energy doing Work32Frank Krygowski
29 Jun 24 `* Re: Petential Energy doing Work31Frank Krygowski
29 Jun 24  `* Re: Petential Energy doing Work30Frank Krygowski
30 Jun 24   +* Re: Petential Energy doing Work15John B.
30 Jun 24   i+* Re: Petential Energy doing Work11AMuzi
1 Jul 24   ii+* Re: Petential Energy doing Work7Frank Krygowski
1 Jul 24   iii`* Re: Petential Energy doing Work6Frank Krygowski
15 Jul 24   iii +* Re: Petential Energy doing Work2Frank Krygowski
16 Jul 24   iii i`- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1Jeff Liebermann
15 Jul 24   iii `* Re: Petential Energy doing Work3Jeff Liebermann
16 Jul 24   iii  `* Re: Petential Energy doing Work2Frank Krygowski
16 Jul 24   iii   `- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1Jeff Liebermann
1 Jul 24   ii+- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1Frank Krygowski
1 Jul 24   ii+- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1John B.
2 Jul 24   ii`- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1Zen Cycle
1 Jul 24   i`* Re: Petential Energy doing Work3John B.
2 Jul 24   i `* Re: Petential Energy doing Work2John B.
14 Jul 24   i  `- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1John B.
30 Jun 24   `* Re: Petential Energy doing Work14Jeff Liebermann
30 Jun 24    +* Re: Petential Energy doing Work10John B.
30 Jun 24    i+* Re: Petential Energy doing Work6Catrike Ryder
30 Jun 24    ii+* Re: Petential Energy doing Work2Catrike Ryder
30 Jun 24    iii`- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1Catrike Ryder
1 Jul 24    ii`* Re: Petential Energy doing Work3John B.
2 Jul 24    ii `* Re: Petential Energy doing Work2John B.
14 Jul 24    ii  `- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1John B.
1 Jul 24    i`* Re: Petential Energy doing Work3John B.
2 Jul 24    i `* Re: Petential Energy doing Work2Zen Cycle
14 Jul 24    i  `- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1John B.
30 Jun 24    `* Re: Petential Energy doing Work3Jeff Liebermann
30 Jun 24     +- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1Jeff Liebermann
2 Jul 24     `- Re: Petential Energy doing Work1Jeff Liebermann

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal