Re: Petential Energy doing Work

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:55:24 GMT, Tom Kunich <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:

The formula is clear - PE grav.=m

Not very clear.  You're cut-n-paste did something funny to the letter
"g".  I'm seeing a double image of the "g" when I highlight it, but
otherwise, it looks normal.  How did you do that?

The gain in potential energy is there.

Where?  You didn't show what your symbols meant.  You threw in a
superfluous period.  You didn't use the correct symbol for potential
energy.  You didn't explain how the gain is calculated from whatever
is "in there".  You didn't provide an corroborating reference or
examples.  Try get it right or you'll fail the exam.

Neo : What is the Matrix?
Trinity : The answer is out there, Neo, and it's looking for you, and
it will find you if you want it to.

I also told you where it went though as a Plant Engineer apparently that wasn't included in your plant.

Huh?  That sentence makes no sense.  Kinda looks like two partial
sentences spliced together.  I would suggest that you proof-read your
rants before posting, but since you always do the opposite of what I
recommend, you'll only make things worse.  So, I'll just recommend you
continue acting illiterate and suggest you not make any corrections.

Incidentally, your NNTP header is still had a problem.  It looks like
this, unchanged from Jan 2024:

Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Petential Energy
doing Work

This was probably caused by your use of the Newshosting.com
Newsreader:
<https://www.newshosting.com/newsreader/>
In keeping with my previous non-recommendation, I suggest you ignore
the problem.  I advised you to try a different newsreader, but
predictably, you did nothing.

--
Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558