Re: Some bicycle paths...

On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:31:14 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 7/19/2024 4:15 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 7/19/2024 3:12 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

On 7/19/2024 11:35 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 7/19/2024 10:14 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 7/19/2024 8:55 AM, AMuzi wrote:

>
Politically disfavored citizens do hard time for 'trespass'*:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/-right-thing-jan-6-rioter-says-sentenced-25-years-prison-rcna104934
>

>
"... she believed she had the right to climb over broken glass to
enter the Capitol ..."
>
As someone said here recently, "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes."
>

>
She did not break the glass.
>
Capitol Security held the doors open for citizens exercising their
1st Amendment rights to assemble and petition for redress.

>
I see, is that why the "peaceful petitioners" decided to smash the
windows out of the doors? I'm struggling to see why the "vandalism"
was necessary if the capital police politely held the doors open for
those "peaceful petitioners",
>
https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/211228144847-09-jan-6-capitol-unf-restricted.jpg?q=w_1576,c_fill
>
https://www.usatoday.com/gcdn/presto/2021/01/06/USAT/f5253d0f-3d53-416d-881b-7d1a34c52fff-GettyImages-1294942197.jpg?width=660&height=440&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp
>
https://www.usatoday.com/gcdn/presto/2021/12/28/USAT/b54ed3a4-53fa-4112-b68d-fe0adb474c94-AP21006809982539.jpg?width=1320&height=880&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp
>
I guess this image is those very polite officers holding the door open
for peaceful petitioners
>
https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2022/01/05/ap21133832328925_slide-6b6b89838b8fb9e340b428c8030bedf4ea3e845b.jpg?s=2000&c=85&f=webp
>
let alone why those polite police felt the need to draw their weapons
and fire them.
>
https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/211228143850-18-jan-6-capitol-unf.jpg?q=w_1576,c_fill
>
Sorry andrew, but the narrative that it was a peaceful protest is
complete unmitigated bullshit (read: a fucking lie).
>
What's more disappointing is that you're intelligent enough to
understand what really happened, unlike a certain other deluded
kool-aide drinker in this forum.
>
It was an attempted insurrection. There was no "peaceful redress"
intended. The rioters stormed the capital with the intent of
preventing the peaceful transition of power through violence and
intimidation. Those who were jailed for it didn't get nearly what the
deserved. It was treason, nothing less.
>

No one's defending felony assault, but most of the 6 January
prisoners did no such thing.

>
Actually, you're doing just that, trying to claim it was a peaceful
protest to address a grievance. It was nothing of the kind, and your
kowtowing to the magatard mob is very specifically condoning felonious
assault.

 
Perhaps I was not clear.
 
No one's defending felony assault, but most of the 6
January prisoners did no such thing.
 
Does that help?

>
No. Even if they were not assaulting security guards or smashing
windows, anyone partipating in that crowd and entering where they were
clearly forbidden to enter was taking part in a riot. And their
objective was clear: To prevent the peaceful transfer of power that was
intended by the constitution, and properly done every prior time without
exception.

It didn't help that they were they preferred the "wrong" party.

https://nypost.com/2021/06/20/hundreds-of-nyc-rioters-looters-have-charges-dropped/