Sujet : Re: Some bicycle paths...
De : slocombjb (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John B.)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 25. Jul 2024, 14:35:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <g1g4aj90e4codctdhummefsm8okc8dkt45@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:17:08 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<
Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:59:58 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
The guns I argue against are absolutely designed to kill people.
>
No more than any other gun, and handguns kill far more people than the
guns you argue against.
>
I'm
saying their detriments to society greatly outweigh their non-existent
practical benefits.
>
Apparently, nobody cares what you're saying.
>
I note that nobody here has yet posted a practical
benefit for such guns in civilian hands. And I note that you, John,
apparently do not own an AR-style rifle. That means you judge the
detriments of owning an AR-style rifle outweigh any practical benefits.
>
Well, I don't own any guns at the moment but when I was shooting I
owned a considerable number over the years. I've, for example, owned,
and shot, a number of muzzle loading rifles, I've owned pistols
ranging from .22 to ,45 Colt Auto, Rifles in many sizes and I even
built custom varmint rifles and a few custom deer rifles.
But, no, I've never owned an AR type as I don't have any use for one
but if I was still shooting in rifle matches I would certainly have
several.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_power_rifleBut I suppose he has to make up some sort of story to appear to have
at least a small knowledge about guns, but his ignorance is such that
his arguments prove, over and over again how little knowledge he
really has.
-- Cheers,John B.