Re: cyclists attack auto driver

On 8/15/2024 12:50 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 12:04:29 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 8/15/2024 11:19 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 09:59:47 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>

On 8/15/2024 7:48 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

On 8/15/2024 6:27 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 07:55:10 +0700, John B.
<slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

But the only attempts I have made is to inform Freaky of
the facts.
That, for example,  the dreaded AR-15 doesn't have a fire
rate any
higher then, oh say, the Glock 19, a popular police sidearm.
Or that the vast majority of gun homicides are committed
with pistols
not rifles of any sort.

>
None of that matters to the anti-gun group thinkers. Their
exalted
leaders want them banned, so they're just repeating it.

>
And none of that matters to the pro-gun group thinkers.
Their exalted leaders want unrestricted access, so they're
just drinking the magatard kool-aide and parroting what
their masters want.
>
https://www.congress.gov/amendment/115th-congress/house-amendment/379

>
That's my Congreessman ?.
I just voted for him again two days ago.

>
<chuckle> Junior thinks people buy guns because they've been told to
buy them.

>
Yes, I do. Most people who buy guns do so because they are told to think
they need one. Many others buy one for the novelty. The number of people
who buy guns because the _actually_ need them is miniscule.

 I support your right to express that group-thought based opinion,
Junior.

Post a reference which supports:
- Most people who buy guns do so because they are told to think
they need one.
- Many others buy one for the novelty.
- The number of people who buy guns because the _actually_ need them is minuscule.
are examples of group think, dumbass.
--
Add xx to reply