Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:54:16 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:Note no actual sciences in the list. Nor advanced technical (medicine, engineering, architecture...).
On 8/20/2024 10:38 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:...and many with a near, or even a totallly worthless degree.On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 11:25:49 -0400, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 8/20/2024 8:49 AM, AMuzi wrote:>>>
The formal education racket is not for everyone, but education is nearly
free, requiring only time, diligence and access to a few used book stores.
Sorry, Andrew, that's true only for the lowest definition of "education."
>
In one of the first engineering classes I took, the teacher said
something like "Look at the guys standing to your left and right. They
are probably not going to make it through this curriculum. Only about
ten percent of the men who start this program manage to complete it."
>
And he was right. It's very foolish to believe that everyone is equally
intelligent, and that everyone can succeed if they just try really hard.
>
I certainly recall students who were diligent, studied hard, got special
help, spent tons of time on their work and still failed. I felt sorry
for them, but if they were not up to standards, they did not pass.
Education is a tool. It's what one does with the education that
counts, not the piece of fancy paper they hang on the wall and brag
about.
While it's true that autodidacts often suffer gaps of
education, it's also true that graduates include those who
tested well with little post college retention and also
those of extremely narrow education.
>
Neither is a perfect solution for everyone.
https://www.universities.com/resources/most-useless-degrees
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.