Sujet : Re: RE: Re: Difference between GPS and measured distace.
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 24. Aug 2024, 01:34:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vab69p$13934$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/23/2024 1:39 PM, cyclintom wrote:
I'm wondering why this even matters. It sounds like Tom's distance
measurements are within 4% of each other. Why does he need it to be closer?
It makes a difference to me because I keep track of my miles. Are you telling me that I shouldn't?
No, I'm just wondering why extreme accuracy is needed. If you did (say) 4400 miles in a year but recorded only 4300 miles, would it really make a difference!
I think a carefully set up old style cyclometer is probably accurate within one percent. You could use those things.
-- - Frank Krygowski
Re: Difference between GPS and measured distace.
Re: Difference between GPS and measured distace.
