Sujet : Re: Facebook Account
De : slocombjb (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John B.)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 28. Aug 2024, 03:13:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <pgtscj5704s642kgpuk65jbb1lq9f7agnh@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 18:07:05 GMT, cyclintom <
cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Tue Aug 27 11:54:35 2024 AMuzi wrote:
On 8/27/2024 9:59 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Thu Aug 22 07:44:33 2024 AMuzi wrote:
On 8/21/2024 8:17 PM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 17:36:39 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
>
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 22:28:57 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
On Wed Aug 21 14:53:57 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 17:35:17 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
I was one of the first to program AI into products...
>
"Was Thomas Kunich one of the early adopters of artificial
intelligence?"
<https://search.brave.com/search?q=Was+Thomas+Kunich+one+of+the+early+adopters+of+artificial+intelligence%3F>
"There is no evidence to suggest that Thomas Kunich was an early
adopter of artificial intelligence."
>
Tom, the AI has spoken and you are not among the patriarchs.
>
Remember when you looked for patents in my name?
>
Yes, I do remember. You never specified which company, patented your
unspecified ideas that they used in what unspecified products. Perhaps
I'm also being too vague. Which patent numbers have your name
attached?
>
(Aug 31, 2023)
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/YAgynT7Dw2I/m/R6lf39FEAgAJ>
"The companies I worked for registered and patented their products -
my inventions under their names."
>
>
Actually I believe that the system works this way. The patent is made
in the name of who owns it. If the inventor works for a company then
obviously the company owns his output and thus the patent. But in all
the cases that I've seen the individual(s) who actually did the work
is given credit.
see https://patents.justia.com/assignee/sturm-ruger-company-inc
>
Magazine for firearm
Patent number: 10921075
Type: Grant
Filed: July 9, 2019
Date of Patent: February 16, 2021
Assignee: STURM, RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
Inventors: Nathan Brown, Matthew S. Willson, Dean M. Cousino, Maksim
Sakalouski
>
or
>
UNIVERSAL MAGAZINE LATCH MECHANISM FOR FIREARM
Publication number: 20140325886
Type: Application
Filed: May 5, 2014
Publication date: November 6, 2014
Applicant: Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
Inventor: Jonathan Philip MATHER
>
So, it seems likely that any invention made by Tom would include his
name. If he did the work on his own time then logically the assignee
would be his name and of done on "company time" the company's.
>
Since you were unwilling or uninterested in producing some patents
with your name attached, I had to resort to proving that there was no
patent. Absence of proof is not proof of absence, but it works well
enough to demonstrate that you don't have any patented inventions.
>
And in your case that's saying a whole lot.
>
Thanks. I do tend to say "a whole lot", which is better than you
saying little or nothing of value.
>
There are notable exceptions.
>
William Riley was never credited for his inspired
breakthrough planetary gearbox. As an employee of Raleigh
Industries, the patent papers were drafted as work by two
midlevel engineers, Messrs Sturmey and Archer, who were not
involved in the development..
People who know absolutely nothing about business practives are always the first to tell you about them.
As with every human endeavor...
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
>
>
>
Unfortunately you're correct as usual. I've been around
for a long enough time to do most everything and Liebermann who has
done nothing will tell you all about anything. I suppose i5 iw 5oo bad
that he doesn't understand that something he thinks would work doesn't
because he has never had any experience with thingd that work and
things that don't. Flunky has had very limited eperience but compared
to Liebermann he is Einstein. It is too bad that he can't stop
himselrf from pretending that he is more than he is. He might even be
a nice guy under all of the horseshit. John is an old guy that doesn't
like me insulting these guys who he believes to be experts. That's
fair. But they aren't experts and should stop acting as such.
>
Frank was a teacher and believes that teachers should be respected.
Well, I respect those who deserve respect. It isn't given
automatically because of someone's position. Fauci is certainly a very
plain case in point. He lied before Congress, it was proven and they
did NOTHING to him. Perhaps that was because Biden would have issued a
blanket pardon for everyone involved in the Covid-19 debacle. But in
my opinion they should have tried. He killed more people than in ALL
of the wars of the 20th century.
So Fauci lied? But who are you to complain? You have been lying ever
since you showed up in the Web.
-- Cheers,John B.