Re: People Without Meaningful Lives Seek Power Over Others

On Wed, 04 Sep 2024 11:36:51 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com>
wrote:

John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 15:37:14 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com>
wrote:
 

John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 02 Sep 2024 19:05:35 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
 

On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 07:20:32 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

Not argue but in England, for certain, in the U.S. for perhaps a bit
less, attending the proper schools and as a result speaking with the
proper accent was very important.
In fact I worked with a bloke was spending a large portion of his
salary to keep his daughter in a very  (socially) proper British
collage.

 
Going back a few centuries, their landed aristocracy was very
different from today's commercial aristocracy.  For example, they were
not expected to do any form of paying work.  Money came from the
possession of land in the form of crops and rents.  The disparity
between the wealthy and the poor was sufficiently huge that they
rarely had to think about "earning a living" and other such mundane
activities.  Similarly, their son's grew up in the same environment
and rarely needed to think about acquiring skills and getting their
hands dirty.

 
Well, of course excepting the sons that attended Sandhurst and then
joined a "good" Regiment. And then went to N. Ireland.
 

By time the Troubles had started or frankly there was a Northern Ireland,
changes in society had begun, hence the national trust various grand houses
which where donated to the state around same time as the family couldn?t
afford them.
 
Roger Merriman

 
The Battle of the Boyne, 1690 (:-?

>
That’s long before Ireland got independence and partitioned hence Northern
Ireland both 1920/22
>
Roger Merriman
>

You missed the "(:-?"

But what happened to the landed estates that caused them to be
unsupportable financially? The growth of industry?
--
Cheers,

John B.