Sujet : Re: BOLO pervert cyclist
De : slocombjb (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John B.)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 09. Sep 2024, 01:22:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <jnfsdjlg3ep8vhoras2shgjaacsde1fl8s@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 18:29:09 -0500, AMuzi <
am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 9/8/2024 5:56 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 9/8/2024 9:37 AM, John B. wrote:
>
>
You rant about the AR's but not a peep about the drunks.
Part of the difference is that we don't have posters here
regularly praising drunk driving. We do have about three
posters regularly praising the public use of ARs, and the
great value of owning one.
Even though two of those posters don't themselves own one!
>
AR-15 platform doesn't meet statistical expectations for
crime; about 23 million of those* among some 434 million
privately owned firearms:
>
https://americangunfacts.com/how-many-ar-15s-in-america/
>
From a wide range of manufacturers:
https://www.ar15.com/forums/ar-15/-/118-359435/
>
>
Fortunately, economists are absolutely enamored of large
data sets. Some parsing, examination and elucidation of
actual data here:
>
https://fee.org/articles/are-ar-15-rifles-a-public-safety-threat-heres-what-the-data-say/
>
*Plus AR10s which are mostly .308/7.62
No, no, NO! Your must be wrong!
It your post differs from Frank's assertions and thus MUST be
incorrect!
-- Cheers,John B.