Sujet : Re: BOLO pervert cyclist
De : slocombjb (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John B.)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 09. Sep 2024, 07:38:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <d2vsdjpl7ftt50t5appdnao3ervfnpp6ob@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 21:29:14 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<
frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 9/8/2024 8:16 PM, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 18:56:02 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 9/8/2024 9:37 AM, John B. wrote:
>
>
You rant about the AR's but not a peep about the drunks.
>
Part of the difference is that we don't have posters here regularly
praising drunk driving. We do have about three posters regularly
praising the public use of ARs, and the great value of owning one.
>
Even though two of those posters don't themselves own one!
More lies.
I believe that myself and Andrew are the two main people that talk
about the dreaded AR's but I don't remember any one "praise" them...
>
Oh. I thought you were in favor of them. That would seem to imply you
think they have good qualities.
I don't believe I ever implied that I was in favor of AR types, but I
would add that neither do I oppose them. Nor ever voiced such a
belief, or (again from memory) do I remember Andrew doing so although
I do remember his showing a picture of his wife/girlfriend's AR.
But I must admit that your stated belief that it is perfectly normal,
and you apparently condone, drunk drivers and other law breakers
killing kill kids with automobiles while killing a far smaller number
with an AR is terrible, terrible.
It seems, at best irrational, to say the least.
-- Cheers,John B.