Sujet : Re: BOLO pervert cyclist
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 09. Sep 2024, 16:25:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbn0hd$2e5f6$9@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/9/2024 9:59 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 9/9/2024 8:50 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 9/9/2024 12:38 AM, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 08 Sep 2024 18:01:10 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>
On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 15:12:00 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 9/8/2024 11:18 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 9/7/2024 9:55 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>
You've made such statments dozens of times - effectively saying "but
cars kill more people and we don't ban cars."
>
I've rebutted that over and over, pointing out that the benefits of
cars outweigh the detriments - something not true of the type of
firearm you passionately worship. (Despite not owning an example!)
>
And society certainly does _try_ to curtail drunk driving and
speeding. But gun worshipers rail against any attempt to restrict use
of guns.
>
Good old Frankie... there have been restrictive gun laws since the
1930's.
>
Longer than that, John. I did not say there were not. I said gun worshipers rail against any and all such laws.
Equally to restrictions on our 1st Amendment liberties.
There's one now. Every one of our "liberties" comes with reasonable restrictions, many of which have been signed into law and upheld by courts. Gun "liberties" are no more sacrosanct.
-- - Frank Krygowski
BOLO pervert cyclist
Re: BOLO pervert cyclist