Re: connected lights

On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:37:04 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
 

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:57:15 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 9/12/2024 8:50 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 9/12/2024 6:45 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 9/12/2024 5:40 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:13:42 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

>
Understood. Your near-default point is "Everyone's decision is
correct."
>
My frequent point is "You don't need to go to extremes to be safe,
especially on a bike."

>
My frequent point is that safe is a subjective evaluation.
>
I feel safe on a bicycle sidepath, you don't.

>
You feel safe on a bicycle sidepath only if you've got a handgun ready
to draw and fire within a second or two.
>

>
Correct. Suits his situation, in his personal evaluation.
>
As always, when seconds matter, 911 is just twenty minutes away.

>
"His situation" is shared by many other path users. I'm betting he's the
only one so afraid as to never ride without his gun.

>
Whose to say? Could very well be true on those sidepaths, where's
there's ususally a lot of other people around.

 Since I believe that Frankie brought up 9-11. Had any passenger been
armed at least one of the flights - Flight 93 - would likely not have
crashed.
 And possibly even one or more of the other 3, although the time would
have been very close.
 AND I believe that armed Sky Marshals are still flying. A whole bunch
of cowards according to Frankie's theories.