Re: connected lights

On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:34:29 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 9/13/2024 10:50 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

On 9/13/2024 11:44 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 9/13/2024 9:37 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 9/13/2024 9:19 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 9/13/2024 3:10 AM, John B. wrote:

>
Since I believe that Frankie brought up 9-11.

>
I did not. John's "memory" is on the fritz again.
>

Had any passenger been
armed at least one of the flights - Flight 93 - would
likely not have
crashed.
>
And possibly even one or more of the other 3, although
the time would
have been very close.
>
AND I believe that armed Sky Marshals are still flying.
A whole bunch
of cowards according to Frankie's theories.

>
The first death was a passenger, unarmed former IDF
Israeli American.
>
https://forward.com/israel/349423/the-life-and-loss-of-
daniel-lewin-web- genius-and-9-11s-first-victim/
>
More than competent and yet unarmed and dead, according
to The Rules which make no sense in the real world.

>
So you folks are now lobbying for free carrying of loaded
handguns on airlines? Seriously?
>
Don't airlines already have enough hassles and delays
with drunk and rowdy passengers?
>
Or are handguns too wimpy? Should passengers be allowed
to carry AR-style rifles?
>
State your positions clearly, please, for all to see.
>

>
Here's my take.  Whenever I see reports of some event with
a 'free speech area' I am incensed.  The actual 'free
speech area' is Point Barrow to Key West and all points in
between.
>
In the same vein, what part of 'shall not be infringed'
was not clear to you?
>

 
Probably the same part of "well-orderd militia" that isn't
clear to you.
 
 

Speaking of airlines:
https://www.newsweek.com/air-marshals-us-border-flight-
safety-tsa-1926636
>

 

>
It is clear.  As with Henry's practiced yeomen, recently
discussed, it's a general population equipped and skilled at
arms.

James Madison produced an initial draft of the Second Amendment as
follows:

    The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be
infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best
security of a free country: but no person religiously scrupulous of
bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt2-2/ALDE_00013262/

Note the semicolon after "infringed." Two independent thoughts.

Even the final version, there is nothing that says the RKBA is
specifically limited to the those in the militia. I think if they
intended that, they would have put in print.

--
C'est bon
Soloman