Re: BOLO pervert cyclist

On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:59:06 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 9/13/2024 7:31 AM, John B. wrote:

On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:37:56 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
 

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:01:20 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 9/12/2024 8:53 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 9/12/2024 7:05 PM, John B. wrote:

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:50:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 9/12/2024 7:10 AM, John B. wrote:

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 05:23:50 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>

On 9/11/2024 5:12 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:

On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:35:44 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 9/11/2024 11:38 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

I offered you a risk free way to stop
this and you, apparently, weren't able to give up your habit of
attacking other people in order to try to boost your ego.

>
Oh, bullshit. About your offer of civility, I simply said "We'll
see."
That's based on my prior experience with similar characters in
the past.

>
There was zero risk for you, you could've bailed out at the very
first
time I failed to comply.

>
Maybe if you led by example.
>

I don't believe that you're actually so
stupid not to have understood that.

>
He's smart enough to know a dishonest little prick when he sees one.
>

>
No, you simply couldn't bear to give up your SOP, which is to attack
and berate anyone who doesn't agree with you.

>
Frank disagrees with Andrew on many issues. They don't resort to name
calling and insults at each other. It's because you're a miserable old
prick that you can't handle rational discussion or information that
contradicts your contrived and ignorant statements.
>

>
Well, perhaps because Andrew doesn't declare anyone a coward because
he decides to (legally) carry a firearm.

>
AFAICT, Andrew generally or always rides without a firearm. And I'll bet
he, like the rest of us, would feel no need of a firearm if he were
riding on a quiet bike path where, reportedly, young mothers push their
baby strollers. He can chime in, of course.
>

But does Mr.Muzi never travel with a gun? I see his posts showing guns
in outdoor surroundings. How did he get them there? Mail them?

>
I have carried regularly in some situations but I am no longer regularly
in those situations.
>
Here in Wisconsin my firearms are transported in a locked auto trunk,
cased, unloaded with ammo in a separate case in compliance with the
statute.

>
Which is what I suspected. John the "expert" apparently knows less than
he pretends.

>
You "suspected" that he had "carried regularly in some situations?"
Are you a mind reader besides being a disgusting braggart?"

 
  Lets see...I wrote: But does Mr.Muzi never travel with a gun? I see
his posts showing guns  in outdoor surroundings. How did he get them
there? Mail them?

>
Andrew Muzi's actual response was: "Here in Wisconsin my firearms are
transported in a locked auto trunk, cased, unloaded with ammo in a
separate case in compliance with the statute." Which is what I suspected.
>
John, you're having more and more difficulty following conversations.

How strange... someone  clipped part of Andrews reply.

What he actually said was to first reply "I have carried regularly in
some situations but I am no longer regularly in those situations."

One can only assume that you deliberately deleted part of Andrew's
reply to make you reply sound better... that is called lying by most
people.

--
Cheers,

John B.