Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Sun Jul 28 09:15:10 2024 AMuzi wrote:On 7/28/2024 6:25 AM, zen cycle wrote:>On 7/27/2024 11:14 AM, AMuzi wrote:On 7/27/2024 9:09 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 07:54:47 -0500, AMuzi>
<am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>On 7/27/2024 6:31 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:>On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 07:19:15 -0400, zen cycle>
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 7/26/2024 3:09 PM, AMuzi wrote:>On 7/26/2024 1:49 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:>On 7/26/2024 9:14 AM, AMuzi wrote:>On 7/25/2024 9:57 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:>On 7/25/2024 3:27 PM, AMuzi wrote:>On 7/25/2024 1:01 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:>>>
Purposely irritating others is fun to people who
are childish and
obnoxious.
>
And yet, autos with political candidate stickers
are common.
Interesting viewpoint. So expressing approval for
a candidate in an
election is childish and obnoxious? Really?
>
I see many more right wing examples than left wing
examples. And
when it comes to obscene examples, it's not even
close.
>
>
"> I see many more right wing examples"
>
>
That's because you take offense at them and
blithely disregard the
left wing stickers. Perfectly normal response BTW,
nothing wrong with
that but see it as it is.
I know what confirmation bias is, thank you. I
suppose this fine side
point could be settled by actual counts. You know,
data.
>
But the fundamental point is that candidate stickers
are not
necessarily intended to irritate others, as you
implied. Most are
intended to express support for a candidate, just as
similar ones
saying "Vote for the [police, or fire, school or
library] levy."
>
And they've been ruled a first amendment right.
>
Excellent analysis.
Now just extend your argument one Amendment further...
ok. how about SCOTUS has repeated ruled the right to
free speech is not
absolute. Let's extend that to the 2nd amendment.
Already has been, Dummy, although there's often
political based
inhibitions to execute the laws, as with the Hunter
Biden case. Anyone
else lying on the federal background check would have
been arrested
and tried iimmediately, and rightly so.
As they regularly discover:
>
https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/newport-news/mother-of-6-year-old-school-shooter-awaits-sentencing-could-serve-2-years-max-in-federal-prison/
>
"Deja Taylor has been sentenced to 21 months in prison
after
previously pleading guilty to federal charges of using
drugs
while having a gun and lying about her drug use when
purchasing the weapon."
https://www.tampafp.com/14-year-old-charged-with-murder-father-arrested-in-st-petersburg-shooting/
>
Well, felon in possession, armed violence and so on are
just every day all day. In Tampa they are charged, in
Chicago they are not. meh.
>
The link I cited is for a woman charged with lying on her
Form 4473 , convicted and sentenced to prison, under the
exact same circumstances as Mr Biden The Lesser. Anyone
familiar knows the form explicitly warns that attesting to
false information on the form is a felony.
The laws treats the situation differently when the weapon in
question is used in a shooting, especially when the gun is
taken by a minor who shouldn't have had access to it to
begin with. Bidens weapon was never used in a shooting.
If neither of those cases you linked resulted in a shooting,
they would have reached a plea deal, exactly like they did
in the Biden case initially.
BTW, if you people advocating for unfettered firearm access
had your way, there would be no recourse for holding the
parents responsible.
You conflated two crimes. She also was separately (State)
tried, convicted and sentenced for child abuse in allowing
access to a minor in her charge in addition to the Federal
charges.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
>
>
>
Think about that, if you have a weapon ready to use in case of an emergency, it must be reqadily accessible. How do you train children to not touch it?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.