Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:14:41 -0400, Frank KrygowskiThe sociopathic narcissist sees it as demanding justification. Normal people see it as making conversation - something you're deathly afraid of.
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 9/24/2024 11:42 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:That's fine of the person being corrected understands that theI'm always happy to engage in a friendly discussion, but, IMO,>
friendly discussions don't involve one person criticizing other
people's and their preferences.
>
In my opinion, a friendly discussion would be like someone saying,
"it's interesting that you prefer blah, blah, blah. Can you explain
why you prefer that?"
>
When someone tells me or insinuates that I'm wrong, it's no longer a
friendly discussion.
You might do well to read some of the archives of this group. There have
always been people posting opinions that were factually wrong, and there
have always been people pointing out those mistakes. As I've noted
earlier, having mistakes pointed out is a necessary part of the process
of education.
corrector is qualified to do so and is truly interested in making
things better. In my opinion, you fall far short of both those
standards.
There are many examples of ideas that were posted frequently, and noted20 MPH would be maybe 9/10 feet if I didn't concern myself with
as wrong. Most of them seldom pop up any more - and not only, I think,
just because there are fewer posts. I think people actually learned things.
>
Examples of mistaken claims? Chains wear by stretching the metal. Old
frames get "soft." Increasing spoke tension makes a wheel more rigid.
Tying and soldering spokes makes a wheel stronger. Headsets fail by true
brinelling due to impact loads. Hanging a bike by the front wheel makes
the spokes stretch... and many more.
>
BTW, what was that stopping distance from 20 mph again? ;-)
slamming the chain rings into the ground or doing a face plant on the
ground in front of the bike. 30 MPH would be a little further. Two
front brakes work better than one, especially when the rider's weight
is already more over the front wheels before he applies the brakes.
Why else would you make such a point of berating people who don't do>How weird to spend so much time in a forum whose very purpose makes you>
angry!
You seem to be the one whose angry all the time.
Sorry, that's just your mistaken impression.
as you do?
It clearly upsets you. You immediately demand that the person who doesYour "The "no significant difference" idea baffles a lot of people.">
is an example of that.
>
Why does that upset you so much?
It doesn't upset me. But it's a mistake, and some people actually learn
things when they see mistakes corrected.
things different than you justify it to you. Why would you do that if
it didn't upset you?
----
C'est bon
Soloman
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.