Re: Facebook Account

On Sun, 03 Nov 2024 22:54:46 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:

On Sat Aug 31 14:13:06 2024 John B.  wrote:

On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 23:58:45 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
 

On Thu Aug 29 07:27:37 2024 John B.  wrote:

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:31:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
 

On Wed Aug 28 07:54:51 2024 John B.  wrote:

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:57:16 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
 

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:54:42 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>

Dumbass, I never said that any company patented machines I designed.

>
I beg to differ.  You most certainly did claim that your employers
patented your machines under their company names.  See below:
>

On Wed Aug 21 17:36:39 2024 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:

(Aug 31, 2023)
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/YAgynT7Dw2I/m/R6lf39FEAgAJ>
"The companies I worked for registered and patented their products -
my inventions under their names."

>
Incidentally, you don't "register" a patent.  You "apply for" or "are
issued" a patent.  You "register" a trademark or copyright.  Nice
demonstration that you haven't had much involvement with trademarks,
copyrights and patents.

 
 
But a VAST amount of experience in telling lies :-)
--
Cheers,
 
John B.
 

>
>
>
>
John, stilol mad because I called you on your

 "important" job of being a crew chief of a bomber that was never
active. It was used for photoreconisance? That's NOT A BOMBER is it?
 
Yup, I don't believe that the B-50 was ever used to drop bombs and the
RB-50 was used for recognizance.
 
But "The activities of this unit during the 1950s and 1960s
 are still classified, however it is suspected that the unit was the
Pacific Air Forces counterpart of the USAFE 7406th Support Squadron
which participated in overt and covert
reconnaissance throughout Europe during the Cold War. Indeed, the
squadron operated the same type of aircraft as its USAFE counterpart."
 
While your contribution to the war effort was to carry the tool bag
for an A1C for a few months.
--
Cheers,
 
John B.
 

>
>
>
>
John, I am sorry that it hurts your feelings that I am putting a

 damper on your attempts be self important. When did being in the
service make anyone important if they weren't Chief of Staff? When my
Chief Master Sergeant and the company commander, a Major, tried to
give me an article 15 whatever the base commander said to them made me
untouchable. Not because I was important but because THEY were not as
important as the mission.

 
Did you imaging this? Dream it? Or just tell a lie?
 
You see Tommy an "Article 15" is a non judicial punishment in which
your Squadron Commander (Usually) reviews the evidence and determines
your guilt for some act. Assuming that he feels that you are guilty
you are then offered a punishment which you can accept or refuse. In
the event you refuse the squadron's punishment then you will be court
martialed.
 
The Base Commender never enters into it.
--
Cheers,
 
John B.

>
>
>
>
Why are you continuing with this? OF COURSE I refused and our

Lt. Colonel maintenance commander did not want to overrule the A&E
company commander and kicked it upstairs. If you think I'm lying show
an article 15 on my record if you're bright enough to look it up. The
more you talk the plainer it becomes why you retired as an E7 rather
than an E9

>

Ahhh TOMMY!
When were you in the Air Force? I ask as the term "company commander"
went out of use at the time the A.F. became an independent branch of
the service  no longer call the "Army Air Force". In 1947 wasn't it??
When you were 3 years old?

Another point,
https://www.barksdale.af.mil/Units/Fact-Sheets/Article/320200/
The choice of whether or not to accept an Article 15 is solely up the
individual. Not the "commander".

--
Cheers,

John B.