Re: Oversized seat tube

Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 11/3/2024 12:22 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Tue Aug 13 09:53:59 2024 Zen Cycle  wrote:

On 8/12/2024 1:21 PM, cyclintom wrote:

Facebook is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt publisher you stupid fucking ass.

>
Wouldn't you just love to know where tom get these amazing facts? Silly
me, I think we all know.*
>
That said, I'd love for him to post a link to where it says facebook is
a 501c3 tax exempt publisher since every available resource contradicts
his claim. I suppose we'll get a link to that when we get a link showing
how PWM is an effective method for testing cable lengths.
>
https://www.forbes.com/sites/iainmartin/2022/10/06/facebook-paid-less-tax-despite-boom-in-uk-profits/
>
?While we paid $8.52 billion in corporation tax globally last year, and
our average effective tax rate over the last decade was around 20%,
under current rules the vast majority of this is paid in the U.S.,? Meta
told Forbes.
>
https://finbox.com/SWX:FB/explorer/effect_tax_rate/
>
"Performance Summary
>
Facebook's latest twelve months effective tax rate is 14.4%
Facebook's effective tax rate for fiscal years ending December 2019
to 2023 averaged 18.3%.
Facebook's operated at median effective tax rate of 17.6% from
fiscal years ending December 2019 to 2023.
Looking back at the last 5 years, Facebook's effective tax rate
peaked in December 2019 at 25.5%.
Facebook's effective tax rate hit its 5-year low in December 2020
of 12.2%.
Facebook's effective tax rate decreased in 2020 (12.2%, -52.3%) and
2023 (17.6%, -9.9%) and increased in 2019 (25.5%, +99.0%), 2021 (16.7%,
+37.7%), and 2022 (19.5%, +16.5%)."
>
https://csimarket.com/stocks/singleProfitabilityRatiosy.php?code=META&itx
>
"Annual Effective Tax Rate 17.56 %"
>
>

That means that their canceling my access to my account

>
Oh, you mean this account?
>
https://www.facebook.com/thomas.kunich.1
>
nah...that's not you, that guy's from London!
>

is illegal and
they can be sued for it.

lol...Tax exempt status has nothing to do with their ability to cancel
your account
>
>

judicial watch

>
I have sent a letter to Judicial Watch who is

watching them and perhaps they will decide to use my case as part of
their larger suit against Google and Facebook who are owned by the
same company.

>
I'm sure they'll jump right on that along with the crack legal team
you're hiring to sue me for slander.
>
*https://funatic.com/products/your-ass-must-get-tired-sticker
>
>
>
>
>
-- Add xx to reply
>

>
>
>
>
I would like you to link to proof that your company doesn't just make
snow blowers since you have a boss that approves your playing on the newsgrops all day.

>
I've discussed my company's products many times here. If your brain is
too addled to recall the exchanges I've had with you on the issue
perhaps it's time for you to hang up your keyboard.
>
And if I played on newsgroups all day, I'm sure my boss would have an
issue with it. What they don't mind is me replying to a few messages on
Usenet.
>
I'm very good at what I do, and my company rewards me with certain perks
and latitude. That you've never experienced such is very telling.
>
>

 Absolutely if staff are good then rules tend to be rather more fluid in my
experience! If they are rigid then that’s probably says something about Tom
really ie lack of trust by his employer.
Trust is something tommy is completely unfamiliar with - gaining or giving