Re: RE: RE: Re: Oversized seat tube

On 11/8/2024 3:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Fri Nov 8 20:15:20 2024 cyclintom  wrote:

On Mon Nov 4 15:18:55 2024 Roger Merriman  wrote:

Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 11/3/2024 12:22 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Tue Aug 13 09:53:59 2024 Zen Cycle  wrote:

On 8/12/2024 1:21 PM, cyclintom wrote:

Facebook is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt publisher you stupid fucking ass.

>
Wouldn't you just love to know where tom get these amazing facts? Silly
me, I think we all know.*
>
That said, I'd love for him to post a link to where it says facebook is
a 501c3 tax exempt publisher since every available resource contradicts
his claim. I suppose we'll get a link to that when we get a link showing
how PWM is an effective method for testing cable lengths.
>
https://www.forbes.com/sites/iainmartin/2022/10/06/facebook-paid-less-tax-despite-boom-in-uk-profits/
>
?While we paid $8.52 billion in corporation tax globally last year, and
our average effective tax rate over the last decade was around 20%,
under current rules the vast majority of this is paid in the U.S.,? Meta
told Forbes.
>
https://finbox.com/SWX:FB/explorer/effect_tax_rate/
>
"Performance Summary
>
Facebook's latest twelve months effective tax rate is 14.4%
Facebook's effective tax rate for fiscal years ending December 2019
to 2023 averaged 18.3%.
Facebook's operated at median effective tax rate of 17.6% from
fiscal years ending December 2019 to 2023.
Looking back at the last 5 years, Facebook's effective tax rate
peaked in December 2019 at 25.5%.
Facebook's effective tax rate hit its 5-year low in December 2020
of 12.2%.
Facebook's effective tax rate decreased in 2020 (12.2%, -52.3%) and
2023 (17.6%, -9.9%) and increased in 2019 (25.5%, +99.0%), 2021 (16.7%,
+37.7%), and 2022 (19.5%, +16.5%)."
>
https://csimarket.com/stocks/singleProfitabilityRatiosy.php?code=META&itx
>
"Annual Effective Tax Rate 17.56 %"
>
>

That means that their canceling my access to my account

>
Oh, you mean this account?
>
https://www.facebook.com/thomas.kunich.1
>
nah...that's not you, that guy's from London!
>

is illegal and
they can be sued for it.

lol...Tax exempt status has nothing to do with their ability to cancel
your account
>
>

judicial watch

>
I have sent a letter to Judicial Watch who is

watching them and perhaps they will decide to use my case as part of
their larger suit against Google and Facebook who are owned by the
same company.

>
I'm sure they'll jump right on that along with the crack legal team
you're hiring to sue me for slander.
>
*https://funatic.com/products/your-ass-must-get-tired-sticker
>
>
>
>
>
-- Add xx to reply
>

>
>
>
>
I would like you to link to proof that your company doesn't just make
snow blowers since you have a boss that approves your playing on the newsgrops all day.

>
I've discussed my company's products many times here. If your brain is
too addled to recall the exchanges I've had with you on the issue
perhaps it's time for you to hang up your keyboard.
>
And if I played on newsgroups all day, I'm sure my boss would have an
issue with it. What they don't mind is me replying to a few messages on
Usenet.
>
I'm very good at what I do, and my company rewards me with certain perks
and latitude. That you've never experienced such is very telling.
>
>

>
Absolutely if staff are good then rules tend to be rather more fluid in my
experience! If they are rigid then that?s probably says something about Tom
really ie lack of trust by his employer.
>
Roger Merriman
>

>
>
>
>
Roger, were you EVER employed to haunt the internet all day every day? Or were you employed to perform an actual job and not take credit for the work of others? According to Flunky his boss is of the same ilk!
>
I never oncetook credit for what others did despite the cries of those who wish they could. I designed instruments to automate PCR but that chemistry was invented by Dr. Kary Mullis and he received a Nobel prize for it and that my instruments met the very strict standards for this very difficult chemistry was overseen by Dr, Michael McCown who later became a Chemistry lecturer at a large University.
>
Krygowski believes it to be a simple matter to hol.d the temperatures of samples to a quarter of a degree while shaking them at a specific frequency to hold the contents in suspension without breaking cell walls. I suppose that is why he was paid the big bucks and according to him, I wasn't. Then carefully transferring the contends of the test tube tubes to sample plates with no contamination and adding other chemicals to made HIV observable is just too simple for the likes of Krygowski. He tells us that his STUDENTS were quite able to deal with this form of Robotics 50 years ago. Why robotics was so common at that time that I couldn't have possibly invented anything new.
>
I believe you should look at what Krygowski, Liebermann and Flunky are actually saying. Not one of them has any clues and they deny that I was more than well paid to perform jobs that others couldn't do.
>
"Chris Waters
First degree connection Chris managed Tom directly
I worked with Tom for several years on a variety of embedded development projects. Tom is a strong engineer and a very capable software engineer. As I recall, we were once debugging a very difficult system crash or corruption issue. After working on the problem for a while, Tom found there was a bug in the compiler we were using. That's just one example of the depth of Tom's knowledge. I enjoyed working with Tom and hope to have the opportunity to work with him again.
>

    (26) Tom Kunich | LinkedIn
 Accrding to Flunky and Liebermann and Krygowski these people are lying. I must have paid them off, but Flunky claims that I am a penniless drunk living on Social Security.

By your own admission in this forum you are living on social security, and you were arrested for drunk driving

In real life I am a hard working engineer

nope, you're retired.

with an IQ of 140 who doesn't suffer fools lightly.

Then how do you put up with yourself?

And I really don't understand how people don't see right through a Mechanical Engineer who was fired from the only ME job he ever held, a man who brags about his EE degree who never held an actual engineering position in the hottest job market in the entire world, and a man that is lucky to be employed as a person to sign off paperwork and yet never actually works. I think that you should actually think about that!

Could be that we actually back up our claims with facts and evidence, rather than wild horseshit about being the first person EVER to use the Intel 8008 for a robotics application.
--
Add xx to reply