Sujet : Re: 1972 Legnano in the news
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 10. Nov 2024, 11:28:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <f5v0jj5rspgmdkm0j0ivuk5oesfcf3i1q7@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 21:57:56 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<
frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 11/9/2024 4:13 PM, Mark J cleary wrote:
I always wear a helmet and if you don't want to wear one it is free
county, don't wear one. I am not about to argue just that I wear a helmet.
>
Since this is a discussion group, when you make a statement like
"Generally it is much safer to wear a helmet" you can expect it to be
discussed. There's ample data available calling your statement into
question. Wolfgang knows this.
I have no problems with someone believing and saying "generally it is
much safer to wear a helmet. I think it's ridiculous to argue
otherwise. It's total nonsense to claim that it's generally safer to
not wear a helmet; therefore.....
I believe it'd also be true of riding a motorcycle, riding in a motor
vehicle, or even riding a horse. It seems to me that when doing
something where a head injury is possible, a helmet would lessen the
risk of it.
The issue, of course, is not whether or not it's safer to wear a
helmet, but whether or not an individual is willing to accept the
discomfort and hassle of wearing a helmet.
It seems to me that it should be a subjective decision and it makes no
sense to argue anything other than about the legal right to make that
decision.
Some people favor a nanny government. I do not.
-- C'est bonSoloman