Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:11:55 -0500, Frank KrygowskiWatch as the silly floriduh dumbass continues to think cut-n-paste indicates understanding.
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 11/11/2024 5:02 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:Let's note that your fallacious, dishonest claim of what I "seem to beOn Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:16:21 -0500, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 11/11/2024 5:05 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:>On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 21:12:18 -0500, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 11/10/2024 4:29 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:>>>
The world would be a better place if nanny governments would stop
passing laws for the individual's own good; basically if everyone
would simply mind their own business.
So do you now retract your statement in favor of mandatory helmets for
kids?
No, as I said elsewhere:
>
I believe parents do not and should not have absolute total control
over their children. I believe governments have an obligation to
protect children. To what extent that protection should go is
detirmined by the voters in that jurisdiction.
You seem to be pretending that allowing a kid to ride a bicycle as every
kid did until 1980 must now be classified as child abuse.
Oh my, Krygowski is building strawmen again...
Let's note that you can't tell the difference between an analogy and a
straw man argument.
pretending" precisely fits the definition of a strawman.
"Straw man fallacy is the distortion of someone else’s argument to
make it easier to attack or refute. Instead of addressing the actual
argument of the opponent, one may present a somewhat similar but not
equal argument.
https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/straw-man-fallacy/
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.