Sujet : Re: RE: Re: 1972 Legnano in the news
De : funkmaster (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zen Cycle)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 14. Nov 2024, 22:10:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vh5lfk$2q3pa$10@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/14/2024 2:24 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Nov 12 07:32:24 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
On 11/12/2024 3:52 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:11:55 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 11/11/2024 5:02 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:16:21 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 11/11/2024 5:05 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 21:12:18 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 11/10/2024 4:29 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>
The world would be a better place if nanny governments would stop
passing laws for the individual's own good; basically if everyone
would simply mind their own business.
>
So do you now retract your statement in favor of mandatory helmets for
kids?
>
No, as I said elsewhere:
>
I believe parents do not and should not have absolute total control
over their children. I believe governments have an obligation to
protect children. To what extent that protection should go is
detirmined by the voters in that jurisdiction.
>
You seem to be pretending that allowing a kid to ride a bicycle as every
kid did until 1980 must now be classified as child abuse.
>
Oh my, Krygowski is building strawmen again...
>
Let's note that you can't tell the difference between an analogy and a
straw man argument.
>
Let's note that your fallacious, dishonest claim of what I "seem to be
pretending" precisely fits the definition of a strawman.
>
"Straw man fallacy is the distortion of someone else?s argument to
make it easier to attack or refute. Instead of addressing the actual
argument of the opponent, one may present a somewhat similar but not
equal argument.
https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/straw-man-fallacy/
>
>
Watch as the silly floriduh dumbass continues to think cut-n-paste
indicates understanding.
>
-- Add xx to reply
Gee am I surprised that you comment not at all when Liebermann does the same thing.
Jeff uses links to support his explanations, the dumbass just copy/pastes.
-- Add xx to reply
1972 Legnano in the news
Re: 1972 Legnano in the news
