Re: 1972 Legnano in the news

On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:52:17 -0500, Zen Cycle wrote:

On 11/13/2024 12:11 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 22:35:57 +0100, Wolfgang Strobl wrote:
 

Am Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:13:53 -0600 schrieb Mark J cleary
<mcleary08@comcast.net>:
>

On 11/9/2024 2:28 PM, Wolfgang Strobl wrote:

Am Sat, 9 Nov 2024 10:06:26 -0600 schrieb Mark J cleary
<mcleary08@comcast.net>:
>

On 11/8/2024 9:18 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 11/8/2024 8:49 PM, AMuzi wrote:

Check the photos here:
>
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14061289/Emmy-award-
winner-1970s-sitcom-unrecognizable-77-bikes-LA.html

>
Whoa! Exposed cables! Down tube friction shifting! Center pull
brakes!
36 spoke wheels! Full sized frame pump! And she's not in a
"protected"
bike lane! Is it even possible to ride that way?  ;-)
>
"She adhered to safety regulations by having a black helmet on,
wore pink trainers and had a red jacket tied around her waist" is
nonsense.
There is no helmet regulation that applies to her.
>
And the jacket around her waist is not a particularly good idea,
although it's at least better than tying it around the handlebars.
I know a guy who did that and had a sleeve dangle into his front
wheel. His next couple seconds were far from fun.
>

Generally it is much safer to wear a helmet although no breaking a
laws by not wearing one.

>
So why don't you wear a helmet while walking or while driving your
car*)?  People die while walking and as drivers or passengers of
cars.
>
>
>

Not sure why a black helmet is better

>
Some fetishs work only when blessed by a druid and when the color
complements the aureola.
>

and tying things around your waist is not a good idea.

>
Indeed. Especially, when the bike has a rack.
>
>

Better to simply leave the extra clothes on and sweat. That would
be safer.

>
Questionable. With additional clothing, a fast rider sweats more,
not less. The sweat just does not cool the rider if it is absorbed
by the clothing. Overheating harms concentration, which might become
dangerous.
>

Long pants are a better idea if you go down.

>
Light clothing does not protect much, but can contaminate a wound.
Depending on the speed, it can even cause burns.
>
Winter clothing on a sunny day seems excessive.
>
But let's get realistic. Who expects press photos like these to be
taken on a real bike tour?  What do we know about the journey for
which this clothing was intended? Only two accessories irritate me
here: the helmet and the shoelaces. Bicycle helmets are a
misunderstanding and open shoelaces next to a chainring are
dangerous.
>
*) I assume you don't, sorry if you do
>

I always wear a helmet and if you don't want to wear one it is free
county, don't wear one. I am not about to argue just that I wear a
helmet.

>
Actually, you argued. You wrote "Generally it is much safer to wear a
helmet", see above.  Which specific country are you talking about?
There are countries enforcing helmet laws for cyclists.
>
My question referred to whether you wear a helmet when you walk or use
a car. Isn't it generally much safer to wear a helmet when walking or
using a car?

 
Are you saying that you don't follow the laws of your country? Here in
the US helmets are not madatory any longer and I published information
that helmets in car collisions do nothing.

 
"Any longer"?
 

After that the helmet mandates had no support.
 
 

Yes tommy, you are single-handedly responsible for quelling excitement
for mandatory bicycle helmet laws

And you are responsible for ste\aling from your employer because that is
what you are. A thief.