Sujet : Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Education that is in such short supply
De : funkmaster (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zen Cycle)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 30. Dec 2024, 18:24:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vkul05$1lih3$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/30/2024 11:30 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Dec 24 07:49:19 2024 zen cycle wrote:
On 12/23/2024 12:48 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Dec 23 12:30:34 2024 zen cycle wrote:
On 12/23/2024 12:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:
>
>
Lieberann, you should stop showing why you couldn't get a job in the hottest EE jon mstket in the world.
>
Could it be because you could spell Techtronix better than you could use one?
>
We know he didn't spell it techtronix...
>
>
>
>
But he can't explain why his idea of a Techtronix wire fault detector works exactly like my variable wavelength detector that both you and he denied would even work. Say something else so stupid it further proves that your "higher" education waqs in fact, lower
>
No, tommy, it didn't work exactly like your "variable wavelength
detector". Nothing works exactly like your "variable wavelength
detector" because your "variable wavelength detector" doesn't work - it
can't work without violating the laws of physics.
>
>
What is you stupid excuse for not under standing how their wire fayult detector worked?
>
He understands it better than you ever had the capacity to understand
it. Once again, it doesn't use PWM.
>
Show us another picture of your degree as if your entire job history didn't prove it a lie.
>
Tell us again how some allegedly genius software engineer calculated
that a vote count of 312 to 226 is 75% to 25%.
>
>
>
>
Now you don't even know how a wire fault detector works despite them explaining it
>
"them"? Who is "them"?
>
and showing pictures of the PWM.
>
no, tommy, no one showed any PWM pictures in the context of cable
testing. They showed TDR pulse diagrams, which are _not_ PWM.
>
>
Let me guess, you're an idiot?
>
You still haven't shown any evidence of a PWM cable tester. Why is that.
We don't have to guess, it's because you're an idiot.
Is there some reason that you cannot simply look at the advertisement from Techtronixs and their pictures of it working and not decern how it works?
Not at all. It's TDR. You're the one claiming otherwise.
Tell them that PWM doesn't work.
Why would I? They aren't using PWM. The real challenge would be for you to tell them it _is_ PWM.
-- Add xx to reply
Re: Education that is in such short supply