Re: 8 & 9 year old girls riding bicycles

On 12/30/2024 12:51 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 06:50:02 -0500, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
 

On 12/29/2024 8:16 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 17:15:11 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>

On Sat Dec 28 12:46:43 2024 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:

On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 16:16:50 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>

On Thu Dec 26 14:42:12 2024 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:

On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 09:51:59 -0500, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>

I don't find the need to persuade anyone that child murderers should be treated with kid gloves.I have been on the jury for pediphiles

>
Sure ya were - was that before or after your career as a business
development manager?

>
Tom claimed he was a "professional management consultant".
>
08/13/2023
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/os7AghdvUBA/m/-i474K9uBAAJ>
"I was a professional management consultant - remember? Companies that
ignored my advice failed rapidly."

>

Then you wouldn't mind quoting that fake claim of yours.

>
What fake claim might that be?

>

You are not even capable of following a conversation.

>
Is that opening insult intended to make me angry so that I might say
something regrettable?  It didn't work.
>

Flunky is so incompetent that he has never been on a jury so he thinks that no one else has either.

>
I wasn't aware that not having served on a jury is a sign of
incompetence.  You might want to check your assumptions and logic.
>

So his fake claim is that I was never on a jury to judge a pedophile. His memory is also short term since at the time of that case I wrote about it here.

>
My memory is equally short.  I don't recall you mentioning behind on
such a jury.  Google search was a big help, but only before Feb 22,
2024.
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/search?q=pedophile+author%3ATom+author%3AKunich>
I looked at all 7 articles.  Unless I missed something, you mentioned
"pedophile" and "homosexual pedophile" a few times, but none of the
articles mentioned you serving on a jury.  Scanning for the same terms
in my personal archive finds 3 of your articles between Jan 2010 and
Feb 22, 2204 that mention "pedophile".  None mention you being on a
jury.

 

To be fair Jeff, he did. Your problem is that you searched using the
correct spelling. If you look further up in this post you'll see where
he wrote
>
"I have been on the jury for pediphiles".

 Thanks.  I just automatically used the correct spelling.  When I use
his spelling errors, I wrap them in quotation marks.
 

As we've been trying to impress on our addled antagonist, spelling matters.

 I've been wondering why Tom seems to be increasing the number of his
spelling mistakes.  Since his goal is attract as much attention to his
favorite topics, increase his production output of mis-spelling seems
to be effective.  Since the spelling errors appear to be intentional,
he already understands that spelling is important and has accordingly
weaponized his spelling checker to attract the most attention.
 

As usual with tommy, Occam suggests bullshit. Of course, he could settle
this by giving us the case information. And for what it's worth, his
claim "at the time of that case I wrote about it here" is also bullshit.
>
Tommy never wrote any messages in this forum about serving on any type
of jury before december 26, 2024, and your search confirms that.

 Yep.  Incidentally, I did mention that I had served as jury foreman on
a voluntary manslaughter trial:
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/Rf8Gtd0Q_ig/m/Yq4P64_rAQAJ>
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/6t1qDqyJtsk/m/9jaxjsYIAgAJ>
 

IOW, Just another kunich lie like "I was a professional management
consultant".

 I was going to write an FAQ itemizing all of Tom's lies.  I decided
that was too much work because everything that Tom writes is a lie. It
would be much too long and therefore nobody would read it.
 

I toyed with the idea of writing a weekly "tommy's whopper of the week" post a long while ago but wasn't motivated enough, tommy simply isn't worth that much of my time.
--
Add xx to reply