Sujet : Re: 8 & 9 year old girls riding bicycles
De : funkmaster (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zen Cycle)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 06. Jan 2025, 23:59:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlhn8i$1r4h2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/6/2025 4:04 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 17:55:18 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Be fsir Jeff,
What's a "fsir"? Oh, you must mean "fair". It seems like the same
typing problem where you slide off a key and onto the adjacent key. My
guess is peripheral neuropathy caused by excessive drinking.
remember that Flunky has never once done his civic duty and served on a jury.
I wouldn't worry about it too much.
Especially since tommy is wrong, as usual. Besides that, I don't know about california but in MA if you don't get called for jury duty you can't volunteer, so the "civic duty' plea from tommy is another case of him making shit up.
I learned quite a bit while on
that jury and on two other jury selection ordeals. Lawyers do not
want intelligent jurors. Intelligent jurors cannot be easily
convinced or fooled. During jury selection, I was watching the
defense attorneys rather carefully. They had a list of 12 questions
to ask each prospective juror. The attorneys were not paying much
attention until they reached the last question, when they all seemed
to wake up and started taking notes. The last question was "what are
some of your hobbies"? The way it works is jurors who have
intellectual hobbies (ham radio, computers, reading tech books, etc)
tend to be rather intelligent. Those who answer non-intellectual
hobbies (sports, watching TV, cooking, etc) are somewhat lower on the
scale. So, when they finally got around to asking me for my favorite
hobbies, I pretended to be as smart and intellectual as possible.
During the first round of eliminations, I was the first to be
dismissed for cause. Zen Cycle would probably do the same and be
dismissed from jury duty as being to smart to serve on a jury.
They didn't go anywhere near that far with me (in Massachusetts, 20 years ago). When I was interviewed they mentioned the case I wold be hearing and asked if I knew anything about it. I said no (which was true). Then they asked if there was any reason I shouldn't have to be seated on the jury. I mentioned that my Uncle was a prosecutor for the Plymouth County DA's office and that my Aunt (his wife) was a clerk that worked in the Plymouth County Courthouse (all of which was true at the time).....no dice, I had to sit.
Short trial, it was a drunk driving case, should never have gone to trial since the guy was guilty - totaled his car and a telephone pole, blew a .16 on the breathalyzer. It was his 3rd offense, he got 18 months in jail with a 5 year total sentence. It probably wouldn't have been so bad if he didn't fight the cops when he got out of the car.
But he can pretend that typographical errors are important.
Typo errors are important. Your "fsir" error cost me about 1 minute
of my life that could better be spent on something more useful, like
fact checking your amazing facts and logic errors.
As I've told him before, continued and consistent spelling mistakes are a sign of apathy and ignorance - neither of which are desirable employment skills.
-- Add xx to reply