Re: RE: Re: RE: Suspension losses

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: RE: Re: RE: Suspension losses
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 10. Jan 2025, 00:19:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlplhl$3j1dc$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/9/2025 3:20 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri Jan 3 11:59:15 2025 Frank Krygowski  wrote:
On 1/3/2025 11:12 AM, cyclintom wrote:
>
Coming out of Niles Canyon, you have to ride at around 20 mph Because of traffic I was forced to cross a rumble strip with my 28 mm tires and came damned close to losing control but it did allow me to let 5 cars moving at 45 mph + get past before a constriction. While you're talking about taking the lane why don't you come here and try taking the lane? You would soon discover, if you're lucky, from a hospital bed that California deivers don't like your ideas.
>
Ah. We haven't had a "Bicycling is really dangerous _HERE_!" post in
quite a while.
>
So you judged that nearly losing control in front of a 45 mph car was
safer than legally taking the lane? Yes, my choice would have been
different, and I've made that choice in <gasp!> California; but
admittedly not in your super-dangerous neighborhood. When I do that,
motorists wait until its safe to pass. Exceptions are vanishingly rare.
>
As I often ask, what do you do when riding in a ten foot lane with no
shoulder, when an 8.5 foot wide truck approaches from behind? Do you
jump off the bike and humbly bow?
 Frank, this is California and not Ohio (if there is any real diference in drivers). The roads which used to be some of the best in the nation are now some of the crapiest. It is really not a good idea to ride at 20 mph in front of a car approaching at 45-50 mph from behind that will ride up to within inches of your rear wheel. All it takes is one pothole or wobble and they make contact. Because of this you try 5to stay out of their way. I should also note that the speed limit in school zones when shool is in session is in many places (three blocks from me) 30 mph when children are entering or leaving school. And "traffic engineers" are trying to raise these speeds.
 I simpy cannot believe that Ohio is that different from California. Whereever Democrats control they are bbusy feeding money from the public coffers to each other.
Yes, I know, bicycling is _really_ dangerous where you ride.
But you forgot to answer my question. Again: What do you do when riding in a ten foot lane with no shoulder, when an 8.5 foot wide truck approaches from behind? Do you jump off the bike and humbly bow?
Maybe you simply never ride in such a place, because it's too scary? I'm honestly curious.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jan 25 * Suspension losses219Frank Krygowski
2 Jan 25 +* Re: Suspension losses214Roger Merriman
2 Jan 25 i`* Re: Suspension losses213AMuzi
2 Jan 25 i +* Re: Suspension losses211bp
2 Jan 25 i i`* Re: Suspension losses210AMuzi
2 Jan 25 i i +* Re: Suspension losses9bp
2 Jan 25 i i i`* Re: Suspension losses8Frank Krygowski
2 Jan 25 i i i +- Re: Suspension losses1Roger Merriman
3 Jan 25 i i i `* Re: Suspension losses6bp
3 Jan 25 i i i  `* Re: Suspension losses5Frank Krygowski
3 Jan 25 i i i   +- Re: Suspension losses1AMuzi
3 Jan 25 i i i   `* Re: Suspension losses3Radey Shouman
3 Jan 25 i i i    `* Re: Suspension losses2Frank Krygowski
3 Jan 25 i i i     `- Re: Suspension losses1Catrike Rider
2 Jan 25 i i +* Re: Suspension losses190Frank Krygowski
2 Jan 25 i i i+* Re: Suspension losses2AMuzi
3 Jan 25 i i ii`- Re: Suspension losses1bp
3 Jan 25 i i i+- Re: Suspension losses1bp
4 Jan 25 i i i+* Re: Suspension losses185Jeff Liebermann
4 Jan 25 i i ii+* Re: Suspension losses180Frank Krygowski
4 Jan 25 i i iii+* Re: Suspension losses15AMuzi
4 Jan 25 i i iiii`* Re: Suspension losses14Jeff Liebermann
4 Jan 25 i i iiii +* Re: Suspension losses12AMuzi
4 Jan 25 i i iiii i`* Re: Suspension losses11Frank Krygowski
4 Jan 25 i i iiii i +- Re: Suspension losses1AMuzi
5 Jan 25 i i iiii i `* Re: Suspension losses9Jeff Liebermann
5 Jan 25 i i iiii i  +* Re: Suspension losses6zen cycle
5 Jan 25 i i iiii i  i+* Re: Suspension losses4Frank Krygowski
5 Jan 25 i i iiii i  ii`* Re: Suspension losses3AMuzi
5 Jan 25 i i iiii i  ii +- Re: Suspension losses1Jeff Liebermann
6 Jan 25 i i iiii i  ii `- Re: Suspension losses1John B.
5 Jan 25 i i iiii i  i`- Re: Suspension losses1Jeff Liebermann
5 Jan 25 i i iiii i  `* Re: Suspension losses2AMuzi
5 Jan 25 i i iiii i   `- Re: Suspension losses1Jeff Liebermann
5 Jan 25 i i iiii `- Re: Suspension losses1zen cycle
4 Jan 25 i i iii+* Re: Suspension losses163Jeff Liebermann
4 Jan 25 i i iiii+* Re: Suspension losses157Frank Krygowski
5 Jan 25 i i iiiii`* Re: Suspension losses156Jeff Liebermann
5 Jan 25 i i iiiii +- Re: Suspension losses1Jeff Liebermann
5 Jan 25 i i iiiii `* Re: Suspension losses154Frank Krygowski
10 Jan 25 i i iiiii  `* Re: Suspension losses153Jeff Liebermann
10 Jan 25 i i iiiii   +* Re: Suspension losses151zen cycle
10 Jan 25 i i iiiii   i+* Re: Suspension losses149Jeff Liebermann
10 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii+- Re: Suspension losses1Shadow
10 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii`* Re: Suspension losses147Wolfgang Strobl
11 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii +* Re: Suspension losses142Frank Krygowski
11 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii i+* Re: Suspension losses28zen cycle
11 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii`* Re: Suspension losses27Wolfgang Strobl
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii +* Re: Suspension losses4Frank Krygowski
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i+- Re: Suspension losses1Catrike Ryder
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i+- Re: Suspension losses1Wolfgang Strobl
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i`- Re: Suspension losses1Roger Merriman
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii `* Re: Suspension losses22zen cycle
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  +* Re: Suspension losses17AMuzi
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  i+- Re: Suspension losses1zen cycle
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  i+* Re: Suspension losses14Frank Krygowski
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii+- Re: Suspension losses1Catrike Ryder
14 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii`* Re: Suspension losses12Roger Merriman
14 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii `* Re: Suspension losses11Frank Krygowski
15 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii  `* Re: Suspension losses10Roger Merriman
15 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii   `* Re: Suspension losses9Frank Krygowski
15 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii    `* Re: Suspension losses8Catrike Ryder
16 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii     `* Re: Suspension losses7Frank Krygowski
16 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii      `* Re: Suspension losses6Catrike Ryder
16 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii       `* Re: Suspension losses5Frank Krygowski
16 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii        +* Re: Suspension losses3Catrike Ryder
16 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii        i`* Re: Suspension losses2Frank Krygowski
16 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii        i `- Re: Suspension losses1Catrike Ryder
17 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  ii        `- Re: Suspension losses1Roger Merriman
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  i`- Re: Suspension losses1Wolfgang Strobl
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  +* Re: Suspension losses2Wolfgang Strobl
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  i`- Re: Suspension losses1Frank Krygowski
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  +- Re: Suspension losses1Jeff Liebermann
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  `- Re: Suspension losses1Frank Krygowski
11 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii i+* Re: Suspension losses44Wolfgang Strobl
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii`* Re: Suspension losses43Frank Krygowski
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii +* Re: Suspension losses15zen cycle
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i`* Re: Suspension losses14Frank Krygowski
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i +* Re: Suspension losses4AMuzi
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i i`* Re: Suspension losses3Frank Krygowski
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i i +- Re: Suspension losses1AMuzi
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i i `- Re: Suspension losses1Catrike Ryder
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i +- Re: Suspension losses1Catrike Ryder
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i `* Re: Suspension losses8zen cycle
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i  +- Re: Suspension losses1Wolfgang Strobl
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i  `* Re: Suspension losses6Frank Krygowski
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i   +- Re: Suspension losses1Catrike Ryder
14 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i   +* Re: Suspension losses2Roger Merriman
14 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i   i`- Re: Suspension losses1Catrike Ryder
16 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i   `* Re: Suspension losses2zen cycle
16 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i    `- Re: Suspension losses1Wolfgang Strobl
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii +* Re: Suspension losses8AMuzi
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i+- Re: Suspension losses1Frank Krygowski
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i`* Re: Suspension losses6John B.
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i `* Re: Suspension losses5AMuzi
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i  +- Re: Suspension losses1John B.
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i  `* Re: Suspension losses3Catrike Ryder
14 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i   `* Re: Suspension losses2Roger Merriman
14 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii i    `- Re: Suspension losses1Catrike Ryder
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii `* Re: Suspension losses19Wolfgang Strobl
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii ii  `* Re: Suspension losses18Frank Krygowski
12 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii i`* Re: Suspension losses69Jeff Liebermann
11 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii +- Re: Suspension losses1zen cycle
11 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii +- Re: Suspension losses1zen cycle
13 Jan 25 i i iiiii   ii `* Re: Suspension losses2Jeff Liebermann
10 Jan 25 i i iiiii   i`- Re: Suspension losses1Frank Krygowski
10 Jan 25 i i iiiii   `- Re: Suspension losses1Frank Krygowski
5 Jan 25 i i iiii`* Re: Suspension losses5Jeff Liebermann
4 Jan 25 i i iii`- Re: Suspension losses1Wolfgang Strobl
5 Jan 25 i i ii`* Re: Suspension losses4zen cycle
6 Jan 25 i i i`- Re: Suspension losses1AMuzi
3 Jan 25 i i +* Re: Suspension losses9Zen Cycle
4 Jan 25 i i `- Re: Suspension losses1Jeff Liebermann
3 Jan 25 i `- Re: Suspension losses1Roger Merriman
3 Jan 25 `* Re: Suspension losses4Frank Krygowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal