Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On 1/12/2025 4:19 PM, cyclintom wrote:I really don't understand this hair across the ass of conservatives about wikipedia. Every article has a "references" section, which hopefully supports the article. If there is a doubt as to the veracity of the claim, a review of the references is usually enough to sort it out.OK, try this: https://www.britannica.com/money/conspicuous-consumptionOn Thu, 2 Jan 2025 22:46:37 -0500, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
As Andrew has pointed out, there are exceptions. See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veblen_good
I suspect that someone Frank knows wrote that idiotic Wikipedia entry. That is why such things are not considered proof of anything whereas entries from the Encyclopedia Britanica are.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.