Re: Let's hide the bicyclists behind parked cars. What could go wrong?

On 14 Jan 2025 11:35:36 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:27:09 +0100, Wolfgang Strobl
<news51@mystrobl.de> wrote:
 

Am Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:24:29 -0500 schrieb Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net>:
 

"Traffic traveling as much as 90 kph" is usually much less problem for
me than John pretends, in part because most of the roads I ride have
slower speeds, chosen because of aesthetics. Less traffic and less road
noise is more pleasant.

 
Exactly.  An quite a lot of roads with no limit (meaning limited to 100
km/h outside of highways) are wide enough or have little traffic, so
that overtaking slower vehicles is not much of a problem.  I a driver is
able to overtake another that only drives at 80 km/h, he or she is
certailny able to overtake a cyclist doing 30 km/h only. Most probably,
the latter is much easier to do, for obvious reasons.
 

 
And even those with 55 mph cars seldom have continuous platoons. One or
two motorists at a time are easy to deal with. In either case, when
motorists see me at lane center, they seem to realize right away that
they will have to adjust their speed, their lane choice or whatever.
It's rare to even get a horn honk.

 
Time to show this short video again
<https://www.mystrobl.de/ws/pic/20210710/L113.mp4>
We have used that road quite often, because it is the best connection to
get out of the larger Rhine valley and into the low mountain range
called "Eifel".  Narrower roads, especially those with a sidepath are
both more unpleasant and more risky. Motorists can sniff "bicycle
infrastructure" even when there isn't any. Any rotten footpath is good
enough. :-(

 
 
Now try some of the roads here :-)
https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1762349/understanding-bangkoks-traffic-woes

>
Considering Bangkok’s size ie it’s comparable to London/New York in size
building more lanes isn’t going to work just drive more demand which seems
to be truism world wide.
>

Bangkok and London are very nearly the same "size" both in area and
population.

Car and car infrastructure is expensive and hugely wasteful in terms of
space, doesn’t seem to have viable alternatives to cars and or motorcycles
and the generally lax enforcement and expectations as you note in your
other post.

Bangkok has, since I first came there, built a rather extensive system
of above the ground trains (the Sky Train) and underground subways
(The Deerhound) system and in addition has a vast number of taxies. Un
fortunately they also have a vast number of people :-) so traveling
during "going to work" and "Going home" periods  is very crowded,
(very, very crowded :-).

The roads are a problem as nearly all are bounded by stores ranging
from multi story to "shop houses". A shop house is a 2 or 3 story
building with a shop in the ground floor 1 or 2 upper stories for the
owner and his family to live in and to widen the road all those
buildings would have to be torn down. They did this on a street - a
connecting street between two large roads, that we lived near... less
then 1 mile long and it took 5 years to do.

P.S. Much of the terrifyiing road death statistics in Thailand are due
to small motorcycles -  100cc, etc. that are responsible for about 80%
of the deaths..

>
And this absolutely has a effect on Thailand’s place high up with traffic
deaths/injurys
>
Either way knocking over buildings/districts as the American cities did
with the freeways is unlikely to work, note number of US cities are
removing them or rather some parts of them.
>
Roger Merriman

--
Cheers,

John B.