Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:37:21 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:Right, or possibly Aramaic. People who don't ride bicycles enough have time to argue about that.
On 1/16/2025 3:19 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:I understand that the Book of Mark was originally written in Greek.On 1/16/2025 4:14 PM, AMuzi wrote:>On 1/16/2025 3:09 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:>On 1/16/2025 3:15 PM, AMuzi wrote:>On 1/16/2025 2:05 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:>On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 11:27:20 -0500, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 1/16/2025 4:39 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:>On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 21:28:08 -0500, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>I'm reminded about a parable about a poor widow>
contributing two tiny
coins, a trivial amount, but “Truly I tell you, this
poor widow has put
more into the treasury than all the others. They all
gave out of their
wealth; but she, out of her poverty, put in
everything —all she had to
live on.”
So she starved? WTF? Are you really OK with that?
Good point: WTF!
>
I'll bet you think the guy who told that tale should
have been
crucified, right?
Good grief, Krygowski, you have no idea who made that
story up.
>
-- C'est bon
Soloman
>
[raises hand]
Uh, Mark?
>
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Mark-12-42/
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Mark-12-43/
>
>
As one godless heathen to another, I say "well-played
sir, well-played"
>
Merely not being a Christian is no excuse to ignore
English lit!
>
?
>
I wouldn't exactly call the bible english lit.
>
It's absolutely fundamental, and a gargantuan outsized
influence on everything which follows, from Shakespeare to
Lincoln.
>
(The King James anyway. If you read it in the original
Hebrew (Part I) and Greek (Part II), then I have no opinion
--
C'est bon
Soloman
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.