Re: RE: Re: Artificiqal Intelligence

On 1/20/2025 10:52 AM, cyclintom wrote:

On Sun Jan 19 18:44:47 2025 AMuzi  wrote:

On 1/19/2025 6:04 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 08:46:35 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>

Seattle attorney Brandon Mayfield has a different opinion on
that 60% match.
>
https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-on-brandon-mayfield-case

>
The press release was dated May 24, 2004.  Fingerprint technology has
probably improved in the last 21 years.
>
I suspect that obtaining a single fingerprint from a plastic bag is
probably less reliable than a smartphone scanner.
>

>
Yes, but the case was so egregious I remembered it.

    If you go into a DMV for a license you have to submit a fingerprint. These detectors are run by a full powered desktop computer and usually require about 15 seconds minimum to catalog a SINGLE fingeprint.
If you are arrested you have all of your fingerprints taken and it is not electronic but the old ink and paper method. These are cataloged through rather powerful computers.
 Liebermann with all of the intelligence of a clam wants you to believe that a smartphone can recognize a fingerpriunt with 93% accuracy in a small fraction of a second.
 It is things like this that caused him to never hold an engineering position. Not to mention that he must have really alienated someone to never have gotten a recommendation at the QC job he started at. QC people are not well thought off and are at the bottom of the heap. If he couldn't get a recommendation from that he must have been really incompetent.*

California DMV requires a fingerprint for driving license? Not here in WI.
Attorneys, however, are fingerprinted for their law license in most (all?) States, along with many other professional licenses including bartenders, insurance agents, public school teachers and more.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971