Re: Artificiqal Intelligence

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Artificiqal Intelligence
De : jeffl (at) *nospam* cruzio.com (Jeff Liebermann)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 20. Jan 2025, 18:56:49
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <jn2tojde2rkckkabok37t1bg6gejmgt9o9@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:52:19 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:

If you go into a DMV for a license you have to submit a fingerprint. These detectors are run by a full powered desktop computer and usually require about 15 seconds minimum to catalog a SINGLE fingeprint.

I renewed my drivers license at the Capitola DMV 2 months ago.  They
used a machine like this to do a "live scan":
<https://anshinotary.com/your-complete-guideline-about-live-scan-fingerprinting/>
I didn't check how long it took, but my guess(tm) is about 3 minutes
most of which was the clerk typing something into the computer while I
was doing battle with the eye exam. 

I haven't seen any smartphones or laptops that scan 4 fingers at a
time, so this doesn't really apply to your problems with your Samsung
cell phone.  Have you run the Samsung fingerprint reader diagnostics
yet?  Have you washed your hand yet?
<https://www.samsung.com/us/support/answer/ANS00092382/>

If you are arrested you have all of your fingerprints taken and it is not electronic but the old ink and paper method. These are cataloged through rather powerful computers.

I haven't been arrested recently, so I would know.  I'll concede the
point to someone like you with superior personal experience.

Liebermann with all of the intelligence of a clam wants you to believe that a smartphone can recognize a fingerpriunt with 93% accuracy in a small fraction of a second.

I never mentioned the time it takes to scan a finger on my phone.  My
guess is about 1 second minimum or longer if I have try several times.

It is things like this that caused him to never hold an engineering position.  Not to mention that he must have really alienated someone to never have gotten a recommendation at the QC job he started at. QC people are not well thought off and are at the bottom of the heap. If he couldn't get a recommendation from that he must have been really incompetent.*

I'm currently retired.  I've never worked in QC.  All my employment
and consulting jobs were the result of personal recommendations by
someone who was working at the company.

--
Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Jan 25 * Re: Artificiqal Intelligence42Jeff Liebermann
11 Jan 25 +* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence18zen cycle
11 Jan 25 i+- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Jeff Liebermann
12 Jan 25 i`* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence16Jeff Liebermann
12 Jan 25 i `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence15zen cycle
12 Jan 25 i  `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence14Jeff Liebermann
15 Jan 25 i   `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence13AMuzi
15 Jan 25 i    +- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Catrike Ryder
16 Jan 25 i    +* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence2Frank Krygowski
19 Jan 25 i    i`- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Frank Krygowski
16 Jan 25 i    +- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1zen cycle
19 Jan 25 i    `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence8AMuzi
20 Jan 25 i     `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence7Jeff Liebermann
20 Jan 25 i      `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence6AMuzi
20 Jan 25 i       +* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence3AMuzi
20 Jan 25 i       i`* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence2Catrike Ryder
21 Jan 25 i       i `- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Roger Merriman
20 Jan 25 i       `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence2Jeff Liebermann
20 Jan 25 i        `- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Jeff Liebermann
12 Jan 25 +- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Jeff Liebermann
15 Jan 25 `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence22Tom Kunich
15 Jan 25  +* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence3AMuzi
15 Jan 25  i`* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence2Tom Kunich
16 Jan 25  i `- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Frank Krygowski
16 Jan 25  `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence18Jeff Liebermann
18 Jan 25   +* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence16AMuzi
19 Jan 25   i+* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence14Jeff Liebermann
20 Jan 25   ii+* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence3Shadow
20 Jan 25   iii`* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence2Jeff Liebermann
20 Jan 25   iii `- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Shadow
20 Jan 25   ii+* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence8AMuzi
20 Jan 25   iii+* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence6AMuzi
20 Jan 25   iiii`* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence5zen cycle
20 Jan 25   iiii `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence4Jeff Liebermann
20 Jan 25   iiii  +- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Frank Krygowski
21 Jan 25   iiii  `* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence2Zen Cycle
21 Jan 25   iiii   `- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Jeff Liebermann
20 Jan 25   iii`- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Shadow
20 Jan 25   ii`* Re: Artificiqal Intelligence2Frank Krygowski
20 Jan 25   ii `- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Frank Krygowski
19 Jan 25   i`- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1zen cycle
19 Jan 25   `- Re: Artificiqal Intelligence1Jeff Liebermann

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal