Re: RE: Re: Re: Only 14 gear ratios? Primitive!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: RE: Re: Re: Only 14 gear ratios? Primitive!
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 26. Jan 2025, 00:36:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vn3shd$357et$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/25/2025 3:45 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Thu Dec 5 20:22:37 2024 Frank Krygowski  wrote:
>
If you wanted to talk about the cumulative inflation during Obama's
terms, you should have used the word "cumulative."
>
And even if you did, your claim of 25% [cumulative] inflation was off by
nearly a factor of two. Do the numbers, Tom. They work out to about 14%.
>
Here's an interesting coincidence: If you run the numbers for cumulative
inflation under G.W.Bush, immediately before Obama, you _do_ find a
cumulative value nearly twice as large as Obama's! (I get 24.4%.)
>
Oddly, Tom doesn't complain about the W.Bush years.
 Krygowski, on a good day you're a fool.
As usual, Tom gets blown out of the water by mathematics so he descends into insults.
Your math was totally wrong. Admit it and shut up.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jan 25 * Re: Only 14 gear ratios? Primitive!5Frank Krygowski
26 Jan 25 +* Re: Only 14 gear ratios? Primitive!3Frank Krygowski
26 Jan 25 i+- Re: Only 14 gear ratios? Primitive!1Catrike Ryder
26 Jan 25 i`- Re: Only 14 gear ratios? Primitive!1zen cycle
26 Jan 25 `- Re: Only 14 gear ratios? Primitive!1zen cycle

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal